Planet Rugby Forum

get ta fvck dick wad

merry! wrote:resorting to insults again lads.

you lose.

As logic and reason are ignored, it seems that is all that the average Brexiter understands.

lilyw wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:Sorry, that doesn't meet the UK's self imposed timelines. Please expand?

Both sides agreed a “mutual” timeline .... we will leave with no deal, it’ll be a pain in the ring for some industries, they’ll lobby, it’ll change.

It won’t actually mean much beyond tariffs on goods.

Really - equivalence for the City not an issue then? 30 days notice of withdrawal.

They gave up on passporting over a year ago. It why over 1,000 European companies have registered with the FCA.

fishfoodie wrote:

lilyw wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:Sorry, that doesn't meet the UK's self imposed timelines. Please expand?

Both sides agreed a “mutual” timeline .... we will leave with no deal, it’ll be a pain in the ring for some industries, they’ll lobby, it’ll change.

It won’t actually mean much beyond tariffs on goods.

Really - equivalence for the City not an issue then? 30 days notice of withdrawal.

Hey; who cares about 80% of the economy,


Fuck Business !

The city makes up about 12% of the economy and 17% of the tax receipts. Currently that’s been boosted by a no deal scenario.

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

merry! wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:My sis in the EC has told me that impasse has unfortunately already been reached. No deal it is.

Cool. They’ll be a deal eventually.


The EU clearly didn’t want a reasonable deal. So that’s ok.

No agreement bimbo, so regrettably, no one wins.

no trade agreement this year. but with everything being fecked by covid anyway, brexit losses will be small potatoes.

serious talks will happen after the transition, when brussels realises they are talking to an independent, sovereign nation.

Apparently not, that independent nonsense counts for nothing. The EC/EU is prepared to say no. The blunt truth is, they're bigger.

I am confident you are bigger than Vasyl Lomachenko

Bojo is determined to be laughed at.

Begging EU workers to come back.

merry! wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

merry! wrote: no trade agreement this year. but with everything being fecked by covid anyway, brexit losses will be small potatoes.

serious talks will happen after the transition, when brussels realises they are talking to an independent, sovereign nation.

Apparently not, that independent nonsense counts for nothing. The EC/EU is prepared to say no. The blunt truth is, they're bigger.

the eu is bigger, but we'll have more flexibility. the eu's position in the world remains unchanged, other than losing one of its most prosperous members.………………………………………..those are known knowns.

The EU is indeed bigger.

But hey, my little sovereign friend, take pride in having been "one of the most prosperous members" of the EU.

You left it, head held high, as its 12th most prosperous member out of 28. Or 15th out of 31, counting the Schengen EEA members.

shereblue wrote:

merry! wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

merry! wrote: no trade agreement this year. but with everything being fecked by covid anyway, brexit losses will be small potatoes.

serious talks will happen after the transition, when brussels realises they are talking to an independent, sovereign nation.

Apparently not, that independent nonsense counts for nothing. The EC/EU is prepared to say no. The blunt truth is, they're bigger.

the eu is bigger, but we'll have more flexibility. the eu's position in the world remains unchanged, other than losing one of its most prosperous members.………………………………………..those are known knowns.

The EU is indeed bigger.

But hey, my little sovereign friend, take pride in being "one of the most prosperous members" of the EU.

You left it, head held high, as its 12th most prosperous member out of 28. Or 15th out of 31, counting the Schengen EEA members.

The Uk economy is larger than the bottom 19 grouped together. 7th largest economy in The world. Seat on the UN Security Council and one of the largest global diplomatic forces in the world.

Sherblue says we are 12th. Which considering there’s not even 12 net contributors in the EU is a surprise.

bimboman wrote:

shereblue wrote:

merry! wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

merry! wrote: no trade agreement this year. but with everything being fecked by covid anyway, brexit losses will be small potatoes.

serious talks will happen after the transition, when brussels realises they are talking to an independent, sovereign nation.

Apparently not, that independent nonsense counts for nothing. The EC/EU is prepared to say no. The blunt truth is, they're bigger.

the eu is bigger, but we'll have more flexibility. the eu's position in the world remains unchanged, other than losing one of its most prosperous members.………………………………………..those are known knowns.

The EU is indeed bigger.

But hey, my little sovereign friend, take pride in being "one of the most prosperous members" of the EU.

You left it, head held high, as its 12th most prosperous member out of 28. Or 15th out of 31, counting the Schengen EEA members.

The Uk economy is larger than the bottom 19 grouped together. 7th largest economy in The world. Seat on the UN Security Council and one of the largest global diplomatic forces in the world.

Sherblue says we are 12th. Which considering there’s not even 12 net contributors in the EU is a surprise.

Size of economy is not "prosperity". How many times have you made us all feel poor, "because Switzerland".

Neither is "prosperity" a seat on the UN Security Council. And neither would it be connected with being a "largest diplomatic force" [incidentally, the UK is now diplomatically diminished to US vassal state].

https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

On the bacon front, chauvinist or not, the UK's male pigs are unanimously opposed to Boris' Brexit and pro Barnier's level playing field.

Polling evidence?

None to be fair. However, you could go Stateside and watch their chemically enhanced porkers being castrated without anaesthetic. All within the regulations.

Size of economy is not "prosperity". How many times have you made us all feel poor, "because Switzerland".

Neither is "prosperity" a seat on the UN Security Council. And neither would it be connected with being a "largest diplomatic force" [incidentally, the UK is now diplomatically diminished to US vassal state].

Love the statement about our diminished diplomacy.... so certain , subjective nonsense.

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Or the EU is dangerously reliant on the UK market for its production and sales.

bimboman wrote:

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Or the EU is dangerously reliant on the UK market for its production and sales.

You really should just pack it in. In your 10000's of posts on this thread you have achieved nothing.

sorCrer wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Or the EU is dangerously reliant on the UK market for its production and sales.

You really should just pack it in. In your 10000's of posts on this thread you have achieved nothing.

Where as everyone of yours has changed the world.

bimboman wrote: Sawtooth the Beaver wro ... and sales.

Yes, doubtless unnecessary pain on both sides if a deal cannot be reached or an extension requested and granted to buy time.

Which begs the question, will it be easier for the producers to find alternate buyers of their products inside or outside the EU or for the UK to source from alternate suppliers and /or fix the supply chain.

Where is the smart money?

sorCrer wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Or the EU is dangerously reliant on the UK market for its production and sales.

You really should just pack it in. In your 10000's of posts on this thread you have achieved nothing.

I wouldn't say he's achieved nothing: he's probably driven away a lot of sensible posters from the thread who might have contributed, but won't because of the toxic nature of any response from Bimbo and his coterie of similar minded posters.

He'd probably chalk that up as a win.

Rinkals wrote:

sorCrer wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Or the EU is dangerously reliant on the UK market for its production and sales.

You really should just pack it in. In your 10000's of posts on this thread you have achieved nothing.

I wouldn't say he's achieved nothing: he's probably driven away a lot of sensible posters from the thread who might have contributed, but won't because of the toxic nature of any response from Bimbo and his coterie of similar minded posters.

He'd probably chalk that up as a win.

Balanced out by the likes of you.

Sensible posters: those who agree with you and feed your neediness. You do not seen to cope well with views that do not mirror your own.

Mick Mannock wrote:

Rinkals wrote:

sorCrer wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Sawtooth the Beaver wrote:https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/ ... M-lnb4SA8U

Time for a poll. BLT or no BLT by early February?

Or the EU is dangerously reliant on the UK market for its production and sales.

You really should just pack it in. In your 10000's of posts on this thread you have achieved nothing.

I wouldn't say he's achieved nothing: he's probably driven away a lot of sensible posters from the thread who might have contributed, but won't because of the toxic nature of any response from Bimbo and his coterie of similar minded posters.

He'd probably chalk that up as a win.

Balanced out by the likes of you.

Sensible posters: those who agree with you and feed your neediness. You do not seen to cope well with views that do not mirror your own.

I cope well enough.

If I read something that does not coincide with my own views, I like to think that I will look at it and, if necessary, change my view.

Not find irrelevant details through which I can attempt to undermine what is being said or shout it down so that I can win on the internet.

merry! wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:My sis in the EC has told me that impasse has unfortunately already been reached. No deal it is.

Cool. They’ll be a deal eventually.


The EU clearly didn’t want a reasonable deal. So that’s ok.

No agreement bimbo, so regrettably, no one wins.

no trade agreement this year. but with everything being fecked by covid anyway, brexit losses will be small potatoes.

serious talks will happen after the transition, when brussels realises they are talking to an independent, sovereign nation.

Hellraiser wrote:

merry! wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Wyndham Upalot wrote:My sis in the EC has told me that impasse has unfortunately already been reached. No deal it is.

Cool. They’ll be a deal eventually.


The EU clearly didn’t want a reasonable deal. So that’s ok.

No agreement bimbo, so regrettably, no one wins.

no trade agreement this year. but with everything being fecked by covid anyway, brexit losses will be small potatoes.

serious talks will happen after the transition, when brussels realises they are talking to an independent, sovereign nation.

Which is why the Express is running with the headline :

"BORIS WANTS TO FIX UNFAIR BREXIT DEAL"

That would be the Brexit deal that Boris personally negotiated, getting the EU to reopen the WA to make changes he personally wanted, including changing the Political Declaration to a form he thought better for the UK, then signing said agreement, bringing it to the HoC and getting passed by the HoC.

No wonder the EU don't trust either Boris, the UK government, or the UK negotiators.

If this resiling of previously agreed positions continues to be the UK line expect the EU to start publishing exactly what the restrictions the UK will face in a hard Brexit, inter alia, :

- visa/visa exemption requirements for UK citizens wanting to go abroad
- a few hundred haulage licences for the entire UK haulage industry
- no food exports from the UK to the EU because the UK refuses to accept EU standards
- British registered aircraft and airlines can't fly 'cabotage' within the EU
- UK awarded degrees no longer recognised by the EU

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Are they allowed to pass punitive legislation of the nature you describe as a “punishment “ under ECJ law ?

cammy's learned a new word..

search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&keyw ... or_id=4907

merry! wrote:cammy's learned a new word..

, he has. And is trying to crow bar it into every post.

bimboman wrote:

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Are they allowed to pass punitive legislation of the nature you describe as a “punishment “ under ECJ law ?

Which bits require punitive legislation, and which bits arise by default because the uk chose to leave without an FTA?

Leinster in London wrote:

bimboman wrote:

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Are they allowed to pass punitive legislation of the nature you describe as a “punishment “ under ECJ law ?

Which bits require punitive legislation, and which bits arise by default because the uk chose to leave without an FTA?

Dunno, that’s kinda the question. Free trade agreements don’t cover much of Cammys assertions.

Leinster in London wrote:

bimboman wrote:

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Are they allowed to pass punitive legislation of the nature you describe as a “punishment “ under ECJ law ?

Which bits require punitive legislation, and which bits arise by default because the uk chose to leave without an FTA?

"People knew what they were voting for !"

fishfoodie wrote:

Leinster in London wrote:

bimboman wrote:

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Are they allowed to pass punitive legislation of the nature you describe as a “punishment “ under ECJ law ?

Which bits require punitive legislation, and which bits arise by default because the uk chose to leave without an FTA?

"People knew what they were voting for !"

Agree - we were the ones leaving the club so can't understand why folk now expect to have some of the benefits without paying their dues. It was our choice to leave (unfortunately) so we are really dependant on the EU telling us what the price is for the benefits we wish to retain. If we dont like the price we just dont pay the price them up and suffer the consequences. I honestly can't see what the problem is, we all knew this is how it would play out and that our bargaining position was weak and even weaker now post Cover19. There isn't anything punative about this, it is merely the EU getting the best deal they can for their member states and if we are on our knees then why wouldn't they use this to their advantage and seek as good a price as they can? This is a big boys game and I honestly think that the Blonde Bumbelcunt has completely fecked up with the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration and is trying to get out of his signed up promises. He has backed himself and his party into a corner and they are going to implode once folk realise exactly what he has signed them up to and what the implications are. A border in the Irish Sea is just a wee starter for 10.

camroc1 wrote:

Which is why the Express is running with the headline :

"BORIS WANTS TO FIX UNFAIR BREXIT DEAL"

That would be the Brexit deal that Boris personally negotiated, getting the EU to reopen the WA to make changes he personally wanted, including changing the Political Declaration to a form he thought better for the UK, then signing said agreement, bringing it to the HoC and getting passed by the HoC.

No wonder the EU don't trust either Boris, the UK government, or the UK negotiators.

If this resiling of previously agreed positions continues to be the UK line expect the EU to start publishing exactly what the restrictions the UK will face in a hard Brexit, inter alia, :

- visa/visa exemption requirements for UK citizens wanting to go abroad
- a few hundred haulage licences for the entire UK haulage industry
- no food exports from the UK to the EU because the UK refuses to accept EU standards
- British registered aircraft and airlines can't fly 'cabotage' within the EU
- UK awarded degrees no longer recognised by the EU

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Boris never wanted that deal. He was desperate to get any deal to leave as he had promised but couldn't get parliament to back anything he did so tried to appease them. Now the idiot has a majority he doesn't want to stick to it.

Anonymous. wrote:

camroc1 wrote:

Which is why the Express is running with the headline :

"BORIS WANTS TO FIX UNFAIR BREXIT DEAL"

That would be the Brexit deal that Boris personally negotiated, getting the EU to reopen the WA to make changes he personally wanted, including changing the Political Declaration to a form he thought better for the UK, then signing said agreement, bringing it to the HoC and getting passed by the HoC.

No wonder the EU don't trust either Boris, the UK government, or the UK negotiators.

If this resiling of previously agreed positions continues to be the UK line expect the EU to start publishing exactly what the restrictions the UK will face in a hard Brexit, inter alia, :

- visa/visa exemption requirements for UK citizens wanting to go abroad
- a few hundred haulage licences for the entire UK haulage industry
- no food exports from the UK to the EU because the UK refuses to accept EU standards
- British registered aircraft and airlines can't fly 'cabotage' within the EU
- UK awarded degrees no longer recognised by the EU

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Boris never wanted that deal. He was desperate to get any deal to leave as he had promised but couldn't get parliament to back anything he did so tried to appease them. Now the idiot has a majority he doesn't want to stick to it.

The world doesn't work like that.

camroc1 wrote:

Anonymous. wrote:

camroc1 wrote:

Which is why the Express is running with the headline :

"BORIS WANTS TO FIX UNFAIR BREXIT DEAL"

That would be the Brexit deal that Boris personally negotiated, getting the EU to reopen the WA to make changes he personally wanted, including changing the Political Declaration to a form he thought better for the UK, then signing said agreement, bringing it to the HoC and getting passed by the HoC.

No wonder the EU don't trust either Boris, the UK government, or the UK negotiators.

If this resiling of previously agreed positions continues to be the UK line expect the EU to start publishing exactly what the restrictions the UK will face in a hard Brexit, inter alia, :

- visa/visa exemption requirements for UK citizens wanting to go abroad
- a few hundred haulage licences for the entire UK haulage industry
- no food exports from the UK to the EU because the UK refuses to accept EU standards
- British registered aircraft and airlines can't fly 'cabotage' within the EU
- UK awarded degrees no longer recognised by the EU

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Boris never wanted that deal. He was desperate to get any deal to leave as he had promised but couldn't get parliament to back anything he did so tried to appease them. Now the idiot has a majority he doesn't want to stick to it.

The world doesn't work like that.

you've not met many old etonians have you?
you try telling them they can't do exctly what they want

Anonymous. wrote:

camroc1 wrote:

Which is why the Express is running with the headline :

"BORIS WANTS TO FIX UNFAIR BREXIT DEAL"

That would be the Brexit deal that Boris personally negotiated, getting the EU to reopen the WA to make changes he personally wanted, including changing the Political Declaration to a form he thought better for the UK, then signing said agreement, bringing it to the HoC and getting passed by the HoC.

No wonder the EU don't trust either Boris, the UK government, or the UK negotiators.

If this resiling of previously agreed positions continues to be the UK line expect the EU to start publishing exactly what the restrictions the UK will face in a hard Brexit, inter alia, :

- visa/visa exemption requirements for UK citizens wanting to go abroad
- a few hundred haulage licences for the entire UK haulage industry
- no food exports from the UK to the EU because the UK refuses to accept EU standards
- British registered aircraft and airlines can't fly 'cabotage' within the EU
- UK awarded degrees no longer recognised by the EU

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Boris never wanted that deal. He was desperate to get any deal to leave as he had promised but couldn't get parliament to back anything he did so tried to appease them. Now the idiot has a majority he doesn't want to stick to it.

The idiot never thought long enough to even think about deals; remember the two letters ?

This shitshow is only about getting his fat arse into #10; to do that he sold you all out for a damn site less that 30 pieces of silver.

happyhooker wrote:

camroc1 wrote:

Anonymous. wrote:

camroc1 wrote:

Which is why the Express is running with the headline :

"BORIS WANTS TO FIX UNFAIR BREXIT DEAL"

That would be the Brexit deal that Boris personally negotiated, getting the EU to reopen the WA to make changes he personally wanted, including changing the Political Declaration to a form he thought better for the UK, then signing said agreement, bringing it to the HoC and getting passed by the HoC.

No wonder the EU don't trust either Boris, the UK government, or the UK negotiators.

If this resiling of previously agreed positions continues to be the UK line expect the EU to start publishing exactly what the restrictions the UK will face in a hard Brexit, inter alia, :

- visa/visa exemption requirements for UK citizens wanting to go abroad
- a few hundred haulage licences for the entire UK haulage industry
- no food exports from the UK to the EU because the UK refuses to accept EU standards
- British registered aircraft and airlines can't fly 'cabotage' within the EU
- UK awarded degrees no longer recognised by the EU

etc. etc. etc. for a very, very long list indeed, which will just be the EU amending its legislation to account for the fact that the UK has chosen to leave the EU without a trade agreement.

Boris never wanted that deal. He was desperate to get any deal to leave as he had promised but couldn't get parliament to back anything he did so tried to appease them. Now the idiot has a majority he doesn't want to stick to it.

The world doesn't work like that.

you've not met many old etonians have you?
you try telling them they can't do exctly what they want

We ran the fúckers out in '22.

camroc1 wrote: We ran the fúckers out in '22.

It's something the Brexiters don't get because they don't know their own history. They seem surprised we don't trust them.

happyhooker wrote: you've not met many old etonians have you?
you try telling them they can't do exctly what they want

They are succeeding though, they've set out a position with core principles like 'fudge business' and they're delivering on that intent

Some gloomy predictions about the Eurozone in today's DT. In particular "Oxford professor Richard Werner said the euro has become a doomsday machine. “In the end it destabilises every country in one way or another. It will be Germany’s turn next,” he said."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/20 ... rd-journey

terryfinch wrote:Some gloomy predictions about the Eurozone in today's DT. In particular "Oxford professor Richard Werner said the euro has become a doomsday machine. “In the end it destabilises every country in one way or another. It will be Germany’s turn next,” he said."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/20 ... rd-journey

terryfinch wrote:Some gloomy predictions about the Eurozone in today's DT. In particular "Oxford professor Richard Werner said the euro has become a doomsday machine. “In the end it destabilises every country in one way or another. It will be Germany’s turn next,” he said."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/20 ... rd-journey

Take your place in the queue.

Farridge gleefully predicted the annihilation of the Euro within 10 years in the EU Parliament at the time of the last crisis.

Some excellent soundbites, if I recall correctly.