Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
- happyhooker
- Posts: 23124
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
In summary; noone has a clue yet.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
About what? You'll need to narrow the criteriahappyhooker wrote:In summary; noone has a clue yet.
- happyhooker
- Posts: 23124
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
And here you areSeneca of the Night wrote:The epitaph for this forum.happyhooker wrote:In summary; noone has a clue yet.
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25161
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
No wine tonighthappyhooker wrote:In summary; noone has a clue yet.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
YesDragsterDriver wrote:Rewind selector!
I’m well under £50k and furloughed. So 80% of my paye salary?Those who pay themselves a salary and dividends through their own company are not covered by the scheme but will be covered for their salary by the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme if they are operating PAYE schemes.’
It's been repeated many times by both independent advisors and government officials on the media. You will be entitled to 80% of your PAYE
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25161
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
£50K PAYE is the CAP. So you might earn more on PAYE than that, but you won't get the extra.DragsterDriver wrote:Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25161
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I really don't understand why people are saying they'll get nothing then?Saint wrote:£50K PAYE is the CAP. So you might earn more on PAYE than that, but you won't get the extra.DragsterDriver wrote:Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
I'm happy with £800 a month!
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Hated we are, hatedDragsterDriver wrote:Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Ltd company, paid in dividends onlyDragsterDriver wrote:I really don't understand why people are saying they'll get nothing then?Saint wrote:£50K PAYE is the CAP. So you might earn more on PAYE than that, but you won't get the extra.DragsterDriver wrote:Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
I'm happy with £800 a month!
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25161
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Bit rich! won't pay their way then want a bail out, no worse than tradies who do all cash moaning!Saint wrote:Ltd company, paid in dividends onlyDragsterDriver wrote:I really don't understand why people are saying they'll get nothing then?Saint wrote:£50K PAYE is the CAP. So you might earn more on PAYE than that, but you won't get the extra.DragsterDriver wrote:Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
I'm happy with £800 a month!
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Quite.DragsterDriver wrote:I really don't understand why people are saying they'll get nothing then?Saint wrote:£50K PAYE is the CAP. So you might earn more on PAYE than that, but you won't get the extra.DragsterDriver wrote:Wine is back!
So it's only directors earning 50k plus that get no help? Like the IT contractors the gummint dislike?
I'm happy with £800 a month!
My only problem is I have hardly paid myself this year but it has been through PAYE and over £9K so should get something I guess.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Anyway - Spanish deaths increase by 769, up from 655 the day before
BREAKING - BoJo has tested positive
BREAKING - BoJo has tested positive
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
He's not a journalist, he's the editor of the lancet. And more appropriately, anyone can see his Twitter feed and read for themselves his change in tone literally days after that tweet. He was calling for more action before we even hit February.Lemoentjie wrote:Journalist being a scum, surprise surpriseeldanielfire wrote:It's starting to be a sport to find those going on TV or the papers insulting various government responses to the virus are finding their own positions early on don't stand up to scrutiny.
Speaking on BBQT Richard Horton said:
“This is a national scandal. We knew in the last week of Jan that this was coming. The message from china was absolutely clear that a new virus with pandemic potential was hitting cities”
Odd, because he tweeted this in the last week of Jan:
For example https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/stat ... 7517305856 and https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/stat ... 5569352706 - and the article he published on the 1st which contradicts the quoted tweet.
People are gonna be wrong sometimes - what matters is how they adjust in the face of evidence. This attempt at a gotcha just isn't going to cut it.
Last edited by JM2K6 on Fri Mar 27, 2020 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Prime Minister Raab
- Duff Paddy
- Posts: 37565
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Bring back Boris all is forgivenFrodder wrote:Prime Minister Raab
- message #2527204
- Posts: 12857
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Ultracrepidaria
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Frodder wrote:Bimbo's best mate Corbyn having 1 last swipe before departing
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52048213
I guess we'll have to wait and see the state of the economy afterwards to judge if everyone else was right about the effects....the government's response to coronavirus proves he was "absolutely right" about public spending at the 2019 general election.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Corbyn doesn't seem such a bad idea right now



Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Boris Johnson has been diagnosed with coronavirus. 

- Duff Paddy
- Posts: 37565
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Wouldn’t fancy his chancesYer Man wrote:Corbyn doesn't seem such a bad idea right now![]()
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Everyone gets to be Prime Minster for 3 days - then dies horriblyDuff Paddy wrote:Wouldn’t fancy his chancesYer Man wrote:Corbyn doesn't seem such a bad idea right now![]()

-
- Posts: 40186
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
- Location: For Wales the Welsh and aproppriate pronouns
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Gove should be nextYer Man wrote:Everyone gets to be Prime Minster for 3 days - then dies horriblyDuff Paddy wrote:Wouldn’t fancy his chancesYer Man wrote:Corbyn doesn't seem such a bad idea right now![]()
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Hard lines for Boris but Westminster has been rife with the virus for weeks. It was only a matter of time.
- Duff Paddy
- Posts: 37565
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
When was the last cobra meeting? He could literally bring down them all. This is like a moviec69 wrote:Gove should be nextYer Man wrote:Everyone gets to be Prime Minster for 3 days - then dies horriblyDuff Paddy wrote:Wouldn’t fancy his chancesYer Man wrote:Corbyn doesn't seem such a bad idea right now![]()
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Doesn't 1 of the posters know Raab way back? I'm sure someone was having a Globus moment about him
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
no, coronavirus was tested positive for Boris-19YOYO wrote:Boris Johnson has been diagnosed with coronavirus.
- Duff Paddy
- Posts: 37565
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I wonder did he get it from Neil FergusonDuff Paddy wrote:When was the last cobra meeting? He could literally bring down them all. This is like a moviec69 wrote:Gove should be nextYer Man wrote:Everyone gets to be Prime Minster for 3 days - then dies horriblyDuff Paddy wrote:Wouldn’t fancy his chancesYer Man wrote:Corbyn doesn't seem such a bad idea right now![]()
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Think slick knows him reasonably well.Frodder wrote:Doesn't 1 of the posters know Raab way back? I'm sure someone was having a Globus moment about him
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I know a hundred other idiots just like Raab if that counts.Frodder wrote:Doesn't 1 of the posters know Raab way back? I'm sure someone was having a Globus moment about him
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25161
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I noticed him shaking hands furiously with Corbyn as he stepped down.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
What I heard was the the type of test, throat, nose or lung, has a significant effect on whether the virus will be found, as does the stage of infection at which the test is done. i.e. a negative test is not necessarily an indication that the person does not have Covid 19.Raggs wrote:If this was far more transmissible than thought, and already in half the population, a lot more of the tests run would have come back positive. Whilst some mayhave already got over it so not test positive, a huge number should have still been well within the range of a positive test.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Yep. But even then, it's only a tiny % of tests that has come back positive, it just doesn't fit if there's 50% of us having been infected.Ted. wrote:What I heard was the the type of test, throat, nose or lung, has a significant effect on whether the virus will be found, as does the stage of infection at which the test is done. i.e. a negative test is not necessarily an indication that the person does not have Covid 19.Raggs wrote:If this was far more transmissible than thought, and already in half the population, a lot more of the tests run would have come back positive. Whilst some mayhave already got over it so not test positive, a huge number should have still been well within the range of a positive test.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 5797
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Does the UK have a mechanism for temporarily replacing a PM who might be incapacitated ?
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
DragsterDriver wrote:I noticed him shaking hands furiously with Corbyn as he stepped down.


Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
you should leave his kids out of this tbfcomets wrote:no, coronavirus was tested positive for Boris-19YOYO wrote:Boris Johnson has been diagnosed with coronavirus.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Yes, he’s a mate of mineFrodder wrote:Doesn't 1 of the posters know Raab way back? I'm sure someone was having a Globus moment about him
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Makes senseslick wrote:Yes, he’s a mate of mineFrodder wrote:Doesn't 1 of the posters know Raab way back? I'm sure someone was having a Globus moment about him
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
JM2K6 wrote:Makes senseslick wrote:Yes, he’s a mate of mineFrodder wrote:Doesn't 1 of the posters know Raab way back? I'm sure someone was having a Globus moment about him

Don’t make me make a call

- message #2527204
- Posts: 12857
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Ultracrepidaria
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I think the prime minister can delegate responsibility to any minister. If there's no deputy PM, it's the first secretary of State...currently Raab, otherwise if there's no first secretary, then the Chancellor of the Exchequerfishfoodie wrote:Does the UK have a mechanism for temporarily replacing a PM who might be incapacitated ?
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 30666
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Then why is he attempting a gotcha on the government who have been following their Chief medical officers advice, including like Horton changing tact when the evidence showed they should?JM2K6 wrote:He's not a journalist, he's the editor of the lancet. And more appropriately, anyone can see his Twitter feed and read for themselves his change in tone literally days after that tweet. He was calling for more action before we even hit February.Lemoentjie wrote:Journalist being a scum, surprise surpriseeldanielfire wrote:It's starting to be a sport to find those going on TV or the papers insulting various government responses to the virus are finding their own positions early on don't stand up to scrutiny.
Speaking on BBQT Richard Horton said:
“This is a national scandal. We knew in the last week of Jan that this was coming. The message from china was absolutely clear that a new virus with pandemic potential was hitting cities”
Odd, because he tweeted this in the last week of Jan:
For example https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/stat ... 7517305856 and https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/stat ... 5569352706 - and the article he published on the 1st which contradicts the quoted tweet.
People are gonna be wrong sometimes - what matters is how they adjust in the face of evidence. This attempt at a gotcha just isn't going to cut it.
It's not as if the British government didn't take nay action after Horton's own change of mind. That week he changed his mind is also where the British government stated to take action on the matter and the CMOs started taking action and the government started acting on their advice. The Health Sec started taking action in awarding powers for isolation in early February. It's not for the government to react to some magazine editor who has a history of publishing false data (Iraq war) or pushing discredited studies (On MMR and autism). Given his own past he can't possibly claim do as he demands means you are always on the right side of history.