https://mobile.twitter.com/Charles_HRH/ ... 3380979713eldanielfire wrote:Prince Charles tests positive.
Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
It makes them special. A cold or flu doesn't sound cool. Exactly as you say, we'd have noticed the massive influx much earlier had it been around longer (especially if it was even more infectious). Growth curves are growth curves, it can't have been around months in advanced, and still only now have this growth curve.CM11 wrote:Not sure why people are trying to convince themselves that everyone has had it already and it's just that we didn't notice. ICU's are being overrun with healthy people. They won't show up in the death statistics for the most part but I think we'd have noticed a need for a lot more ICU beds around the world over the last few months if it was already prevalent everywhere?
There was talk of two strains though, but I assume you need to get both to be immune to both? So it's moot if people had the milder strain?
Be glad to be corrected by a medical type.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
He'll have to queue like everyone elseMr Mike wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/Charles_HRH/ ... 3380979713eldanielfire wrote:Prince Charles tests positive.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Could be the plot for the film ‘King Ralph’ with John goodman if the deaths go far enoughSaint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
- OptimisticJock
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: FTFT
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
George no?Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I'd imagine Charles will be fine, he'll have the kind of health care normal people can only dream of.
Doubt they'd have made this announcement if it wasn't serious though.
Doubt they'd have made this announcement if it wasn't serious though.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Now it looks like Harry & Meghan knew what was coming and got the hell out of DodgeAkkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Just heard a chap on the phone walk past - “they’ve even run out of penis pasta in Ann Summers ! Can imagine that, serving up to you kids a plate full of dicks ?! Fackin hell !”


- message #2527204
- Posts: 13366
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Ultracrepidaria
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Thank god Wiliam and Kate breed like rabbits. No risk of having King Ginger.OptimisticJock wrote:George no?Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I work in product development for a large auto manufacturer. What has been going on (mostly in the background) from so many companies and individuals is really encouraging. We have been utilising our leverage and expertise in purchasing, logistics, rapid manufacture and mass production to support existing medical equipment manufacturers of masks, screen, respirators and ventilators. Hopefully it will give the frontline workers the tools they really need to do their jobs in the coming months.
Additionally, donating PPE (that is not currently required in our plants due to shudowns) and loaning vehicles to the Red Cross etc. are simple, but great ways to help out.
I don't believe people should go looking for praise for doing the right thing, but think hopefully we will be able to look back and take some satisfaction in knowing we have done a bit to help....
Additionally, donating PPE (that is not currently required in our plants due to shudowns) and loaning vehicles to the Red Cross etc. are simple, but great ways to help out.
I don't believe people should go looking for praise for doing the right thing, but think hopefully we will be able to look back and take some satisfaction in knowing we have done a bit to help....
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
He's f**king self isolating in Scotland!New guy wrote:I'd imagine Charles will be fine, he'll have the kind of health care normal people can only dream of.
Doubt they'd have made this announcement if it wasn't serious though.
- message #2527204
- Posts: 13366
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Ultracrepidaria
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
George too young. Would require a regent.OptimisticJock wrote:George no?Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Sensible - well away from anyone that matters.slick wrote:He's f**king self isolating in Scotland!New guy wrote:I'd imagine Charles will be fine, he'll have the kind of health care normal people can only dream of.
Doubt they'd have made this announcement if it wasn't serious though.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Prince Pedo is probably the only royal even less suited to the task.message #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
What does Edward do these days? Get him in.
- message #2527204
- Posts: 13366
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Ultracrepidaria
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Didn't the government force the royals to carry on working and meeting crowds of people?Mahoney wrote:Sensible - well away from anyone that matters.slick wrote:He's f**king self isolating in Scotland!New guy wrote:I'd imagine Charles will be fine, he'll have the kind of health care normal people can only dream of.
Doubt they'd have made this announcement if it wasn't serious though.
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25703
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Homer wrote:I work in product development for a large auto manufacturer. What has been going on (mostly in the background) from so many companies and individuals is really encouraging. We have been utilising our leverage and expertise in purchasing, logistics, rapid manufacture and mass production to support existing medical equipment manufacturers of masks, screen, respirators and ventilators. Hopefully it will give the frontline workers the tools they really need to do their jobs in the coming months.
Additionally, donating PPE (that is not currently required in our plants due to shudowns) and loaning vehicles to the Red Cross etc. are simple, but great ways to help out.
I don't believe people should go looking for praise for doing the right thing, but think hopefully we will be able to look back and take some satisfaction in knowing we have done a bit to help....

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Sexist. Anne is your man for the job, would do wonders for George.New guy wrote:Prince Pedo is probably the only royal even less suited to the task.message #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
What does Edward do these days? Get him in.
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 25703
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Edward? Prince ‘Cottage’ himself?New guy wrote:Prince Pedo is probably the only royal even less suited to the task.message #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
What does Edward do these days? Get him in.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
George becomes King, but won't have reached majority. Harry become Prince Regent as next in the line who has, until George reaches 18OptimisticJock wrote:George no?Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I could live with that. She seems ok, likes rugby.Mr Mike wrote:Sexist. Anne is your man for the job, would do wonders for George.New guy wrote:Prince Pedo is probably the only royal even less suited to the task.message #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
What does Edward do these days? Get him in.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Harry actually is still HRH - but has been told not to use it. He's still in the line of succession and can't easily be removedmessage #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
- Wyndham Upalot
- Posts: 2831
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Anne definitely has the regal leadership quals in bucketloads. A wise choice.
- Plato'sCave
- Posts: 15390
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:36 pm
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Charlie Windsor is the highest profile since Tom Hanks
- feckwanker
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Great to hearHomer wrote:I work in product development for a large auto manufacturer. What has been going on (mostly in the background) from so many companies and individuals is really encouraging. We have been utilising our leverage and expertise in purchasing, logistics, rapid manufacture and mass production to support existing medical equipment manufacturers of masks, screen, respirators and ventilators. Hopefully it will give the frontline workers the tools they really need to do their jobs in the coming months.
Additionally, donating PPE (that is not currently required in our plants due to shudowns) and loaning vehicles to the Red Cross etc. are simple, but great ways to help out.
I don't believe people should go looking for praise for doing the right thing, but think hopefully we will be able to look back and take some satisfaction in knowing we have done a bit to help....

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
The line of succession hasn't mattered a damn since the Hannovarian take over. George 1 was, I think, 57th in the line of succession.Saint wrote:Harry actually is still HRH - but has been told not to use it. He's still in the line of succession and can't easily be removedmessage #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Never underestimate MI5.Saint wrote:Harry actually is still HRH - but has been told not to use it. He's still in the line of succession and can't easily be removedmessage #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Did he bump into Emma Thompson?slick wrote:He's f**king self isolating in Scotland!New guy wrote:I'd imagine Charles will be fine, he'll have the kind of health care normal people can only dream of.
Doubt they'd have made this announcement if it wasn't serious though.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
The line of succession was fairly ill defined until the Act of Settlement in 1701, which made Sophia heir presumptive - until then it was a much more speculative arrangement. She died a couple of months early to be Queen, so George 1st was immediately next in line. Since then, the line of succesion as defined by the Act and a few minor amendments has been followed to the lettercamroc1 wrote:The line of succession hasn't mattered a damn since the Hannovarian take over. George 1 was, I think, 57th in the line of succession.Saint wrote:Harry actually is still HRH - but has been told not to use it. He's still in the line of succession and can't easily be removedmessage #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
- ManInTheBar
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:40 pm
- Location: Suffolk ba
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Point of order, she supports Scotland, not sure it's quite the same thingNew guy wrote:I could live with that. She seems ok, likes rugby.Mr Mike wrote: Sexist. Anne is your man for the job, would do wonders for George.
Last edited by ManInTheBar on Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- OptimisticJock
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: FTFT
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
I'd vote for Harry....New guy wrote:Thank god Wiliam and Kate breed like rabbits. No risk of having King Ginger.OptimisticJock wrote:George no?Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
At the time she was 8, Elizabeth was 2nd in line to the throne, as the daughter of the Prince 1st in line. The difference is that it was always assemed that she would slip down the rankings form that point - if the King has any children they would take precedence over her, and even if she ended up with a baby brother at the time he would have precedence over her.Seneca of the Night wrote:Not sure I understand you post correctly, but the current Queen was not in the direct line and didn't know she was going to be Queen until she was 8 years old or something.camroc1 wrote:The line of succession hasn't mattered a damn since the Hannovarian take over. George 1 was, I think, 57th in the line of succession.Saint wrote:Harry actually is still HRH - but has been told not to use it. He's still in the line of succession and can't easily be removedmessage #2527204 wrote:He's not a royal any more. Andrew as Prince regent.Saint wrote:
You would think.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
When the King abdicated she moved up one spot. But she was ALWAYS in the line of succession.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Shows resilience.ManInTheBar wrote:Point of order, she supports Scotland, not sure it's quite the sameNew guy wrote:I could live with that. She seems ok, likes rugby.Mr Mike wrote: Sexist. Anne is your man for the job, would do wonders for George.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
As Edward VIII / the Duke of Windsor had no children, she's also genuinely his heir.
- ManInTheBar
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:40 pm
- Location: Suffolk ba
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
It's a monarchy. I don't think voting is an optionOptimisticJock wrote:I'd vote for Harry....New guy wrote:Thank god Wiliam and Kate breed like rabbits. No risk of having King Ginger.OptimisticJock wrote:George no?Saint wrote:You would think.Akkerman wrote:I assume William is being hurried to a safe location far from him as we speak.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Yeah - If Eddie had had kids that could have thrown up some potential issues that conspiracy theorists would have no doubt enjoyed, but as things panned out, she just became Queen a couple of decades earlier than she would have done anywayMahoney wrote:As Edward VIII / the Duke of Windsor had no children, she's also genuinely his heir.
- OptimisticJock
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: FTFT
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Can someone upload the "joke" gif pleaseManInTheBar wrote:It's a monarchy. I don't think voting is an optionOptimisticJock wrote:I'd vote for Harry....New guy wrote:Thank god Wiliam and Kate breed like rabbits. No risk of having King Ginger.OptimisticJock wrote:George no?Saint wrote:
You would think.
Mildly amusing thought - if Liz, Charlie, and Wills were all to pop their clogs, Harry becomes Prince Regent and would have to move back to the UK
- redderneck
- Posts: 15550
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: We'll Never Forget You Geordan D'Arcy
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Unless the IRFU codify lines of succession, this remains a topic on which I am more than happy to defer to others. Which seem somehow apt.
Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Britsredderneck wrote:Unless the IRFU codify lines of succession, this remains a topic on which I am more than happy to defer to others. Which seem somehow apt.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans
Seneca of the Night wrote:You do realise they did have a child who married the direct descendant of Jesus in the south of France and the progeny of that match is heir to Rome and the Realm and Church of England?Saint wrote:Yeah - If Eddie had had kids that could have thrown up some potential issues that conspiracy theorists would have no doubt enjoyed, but as things panned out, she just became Queen a couple of decades earlier than she would have done anywayMahoney wrote:As Edward VIII / the Duke of Windsor had no children, she's also genuinely his heir.
