Page 638 of 1526

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:54 pm
by eldanielfire
Rinkals wrote:
Yourmother wrote:Sounds as though he’s been quarantined.
He made a comment about Jews, for which he was canned.

Some claim that it was a typo and he meant to say "News", but I'm not so sure. I thought he had ample time to retract and correct. Other posters may offer the excuse that they are not on the bored 24/7, but I don't think Bimbo would get away with saying that..
Come on, even Bimbo haters are not seriously claiming it was anything but a typo and it's backed up by the capitalisation of it. The typo sentence was hardly something that was Bimbo-like either.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:22 pm
by Muttonbirds
Anti-Semitism is never very far under the surface of the right wing. Sometimes it just slips out.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:24 pm
by Rinkals
eldanielfire wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
Yourmother wrote:Sounds as though he’s been quarantined.
He made a comment about Jews, for which he was canned.

Some claim that it was a typo and he meant to say "News", but I'm not so sure. I thought he had ample time to retract and correct. Other posters may offer the excuse that they are not on the bored 24/7, but I don't think Bimbo would get away with saying that..
Come on, even Bimbo haters are not seriously claiming it was anything but a typo and it's backed up by the capitalisation of it. The typo sentence was hardly something that was Bimbo-like either.
As I say, it wouldn't surprise me if he'd intended the comment. I'm not really convinced by the capitalisation argument either.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:54 pm
by eldanielfire
Rinkals wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
Yourmother wrote:Sounds as though he’s been quarantined.
He made a comment about Jews, for which he was canned.

Some claim that it was a typo and he meant to say "News", but I'm not so sure. I thought he had ample time to retract and correct. Other posters may offer the excuse that they are not on the bored 24/7, but I don't think Bimbo would get away with saying that..
Come on, even Bimbo haters are not seriously claiming it was anything but a typo and it's backed up by the capitalisation of it. The typo sentence was hardly something that was Bimbo-like either.
As I say, it wouldn't surprise me if he'd intended the comment. I'm not really convinced by the capitalisation argument either.
Really?I mean given the topic the fact he meant to type 'news' actually makes sense, more sense then Bimbo going suddenly off topic and starting on attacking Jews in the news. Another factor Bimbo has in his favour is he literally has nothing approaching such prior sentiments like this.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:56 pm
by ovalball
Rinkals wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
Yourmother wrote:Sounds as though he’s been quarantined.
He made a comment about Jews, for which he was canned.

Some claim that it was a typo and he meant to say "News", but I'm not so sure. I thought he had ample time to retract and correct. Other posters may offer the excuse that they are not on the bored 24/7, but I don't think Bimbo would get away with saying that..
Come on, even Bimbo haters are not seriously claiming it was anything but a typo and it's backed up by the capitalisation of it. The typo sentence was hardly something that was Bimbo-like either.
As I say, it wouldn't surprise me if he'd intended the comment. I'm not really convinced by the capitalisation argument either.
I doubt he'd be very forgiving of a typo, like that, had it been from a left wing source.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:58 pm
by sorCrer
He is all over NPR, stinking it up. :x

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:59 pm
by ovalball
sorCrer wrote:He is all over NPR, stinking it up. :x
I think he's been benched now.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:50 pm
by Nolanator
He has been, we were keeping an eye to see how bed behave, but he was busy polluting threads again.

I don't understand why people bother to engage him.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:53 pm
by sonic_attack
I don't know why you guys get so wound up about him.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:56 pm
by Nolanator
I don't, I ignore him, but loads of others directly interact with him and otherwise interesting threads become unreadable.
Globby had the same effect, but would just talk about himself rather than argue with everyone about trivial shit.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:58 pm
by Short Man Syndrome
He wasn’t banned for anti-semitism, he was banned for being a cünt.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:31 pm
by CM11
sonic_attack wrote:I don't know why you guys get so wound up about him.
It's the total lack of engagement that finally made me ignore him a few months ago. There are far worse on my ignore list but he just hasn't properly engaged with anyone in ages. It's just a relentless stream of opposition to anyone who disagrees with his viewpoint. Biffer had it sussed with his short program but his lack of seif awareness meant it didn't make a dint.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:36 pm
by Leinsterman
CM11 wrote:
sonic_attack wrote:I don't know why you guys get so wound up about him.
It's the total lack of engagement that finally made me ignore him a few months ago. There are far worse on my ignore list but he just hasn't properly engaged with anyone in ages. It's just a relentless stream of opposition to anyone who disagrees with his viewpoint. Biffer had it sussed with his short program but his lack of seif awareness meant it didn't make a dint.
He doesn't have a viewpoint. He just disagrees with people for the sake of it and then nit picks

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:42 pm
by CM11
Leinsterman wrote:
CM11 wrote:
sonic_attack wrote:I don't know why you guys get so wound up about him.
It's the total lack of engagement that finally made me ignore him a few months ago. There are far worse on my ignore list but he just hasn't properly engaged with anyone in ages. It's just a relentless stream of opposition to anyone who disagrees with his viewpoint. Biffer had it sussed with his short program but his lack of seif awareness meant it didn't make a dint.
He doesn't have a viewpoint. He just disagrees with people for the sake of it and then nit picks
Perhaps.

From what I can glean from the posts that are quoted, he seems to have dug in quite spectacularly on masks. A subject I think I briefly engaged with him on months ago before realising it was pointless and put him on ignore.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:24 am
by The Optimist
An Arkansas senator who shared an article that described the coronavirus pandemic as a “hoax” has contracted Covid-19.

Republican senator Jason Rapert, who unsuccessfully introduced a bill to ban gay marriage in the US in 2017, was hospitalised with coronavirus and pneumonia on 24 July.

Earlier in the year, as many states were beginning to take social distancing measures to attempt to control the spread of the virus, Mr Rapert shared an article on Facebook that called the pandemic the “biggest political hoax in history”.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:40 am
by Rinkals
Nolanator wrote:He has been, we were keeping an eye to see how bed behave, but he was busy polluting threads again.

I don't understand why people bother to engage him.
Because if you don't, his version of events is never challenged and becomes accepted.

I was thinking about why CP failed, and I came to the conclusion that, with so many posters slapping each other's backs, there was very little robust discussion and much of the conversation was just bland, and I think if you just accept a ludicrous position without confronting it, then the discourse loses value.

Jerpy, and others of his ilk, were pretty hard on you if you posted something stupid in the old days and I think that kept the discussion honest; if you indulged in the sort of narcissism that characterises a lot of Bimbo's posts, you'd pretty soon get taken down a peg or two.

I'm not Jerpy and I'm nowhere near as effective in this as some other posters on here, but, if the new bored is to survive, it needs posters who are prepared to engage with insight and intelligence (of which I mostly, sadly, lack) and are not afraid to give their opinions.

Wishy-washy won't cut it.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:54 am
by Enzedder
How's everyone enjoying the Olympics?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:58 am
by Muttonbirds
Enzedder wrote:How's everyone enjoying the Olympics?
America top of the leaderboard. :(

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:54 am
by piquant
Muttonbirds wrote:
Enzedder wrote:How's everyone enjoying the Olympics?
America top of the leaderboard. :(
Surely Albania or Afghanistan? Even before America isn't a country

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:17 am
by eldanielfire
ovalball wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
Yourmother wrote:Sounds as though he’s been quarantined.
He made a comment about Jews, for which he was canned.

Some claim that it was a typo and he meant to say "News", but I'm not so sure. I thought he had ample time to retract and correct. Other posters may offer the excuse that they are not on the bored 24/7, but I don't think Bimbo would get away with saying that..
Come on, even Bimbo haters are not seriously claiming it was anything but a typo and it's backed up by the capitalisation of it. The typo sentence was hardly something that was Bimbo-like either.
As I say, it wouldn't surprise me if he'd intended the comment. I'm not really convinced by the capitalisation argument either.
I doubt he'd be very forgiving of a typo, like that, had it been from a left wing source.
No doubt Bimboman would scream 'Evil Marxist racism' for 15 pages.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:19 am
by eldanielfire
Nolanator wrote:I don't, I ignore him, but loads of others directly interact with him and otherwise interesting threads become unreadable.
Globby had the same effect, but would just talk about himself rather than argue with everyone about trivial shit.
I'm starting to get the impression people love winding him up. And yeah going back to Globby, people moaned about his shite but where drawn to his thread destroying posts like Flies to shit.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:21 am
by eldanielfire
Leinsterman wrote:
CM11 wrote:
sonic_attack wrote:I don't know why you guys get so wound up about him.
It's the total lack of engagement that finally made me ignore him a few months ago. There are far worse on my ignore list but he just hasn't properly engaged with anyone in ages. It's just a relentless stream of opposition to anyone who disagrees with his viewpoint. Biffer had it sussed with his short program but his lack of seif awareness meant it didn't make a dint.
He doesn't have a viewpoint. He just disagrees with people for the sake of it and then nit picks

But he attacks always from vaguely right leaning, small government, free market, pro-capitalist, anti-Marxist extremist.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:23 am
by eldanielfire
The Optimist wrote:
An Arkansas senator who shared an article that described the coronavirus pandemic as a “hoax” has contracted Covid-19.

Republican senator Jason Rapert, who unsuccessfully introduced a bill to ban gay marriage in the US in 2017, was hospitalised with coronavirus and pneumonia on 24 July.

Earlier in the year, as many states were beginning to take social distancing measures to attempt to control the spread of the virus, Mr Rapert shared an article on Facebook that called the pandemic the “biggest political hoax in history”.
Funny how many anti-Pandemic idiots get the Coronavirus isn't it?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:28 am
by eldanielfire
AN interesting angle on the psychology of anti-maskers. Personally I think it's a bit more political. Early o when Democrats where ignoring the virus and encouraging Chinatoen celebrations, I believe it was as much a reaction to Trump as any logic.

Likewise anti-Maskers currently are mostly republican/anti-big government types who oppose government interference, claim the government(s) are out to get them with various conspiracies and probably follow Ann Rynd bollocks.

Still for those who are so political and don't like masks I think this covers a good number of reasons why masks are unsettling for some:

Rise of the anti-maskers: The psychology of why face coverings are causing so much upset
Face masks, say experts, can make people uncomfortable because of links to crime and disease and how they change human interaction

By
Sarah Knapton,
SCIENCE EDITOR
27 July 2020 • 6:49pm

A divisive new battleground has emerged in recent weeks between Britons who are angry at being forced to wear face masks, and those equally furious about non-compliance.

Libertarians, massing under the banner 'Keep Britain Free', complain that covering up is an affront to civil rights, and largely pointless when pubs and restaurants are exempt.

Pro-maskers, operating under the ‘mask it or casket’ slogan, brand the dissenters selfish, with some shops even installing mirrors which state: “We have provided this space away from everyone else where you can stare at your reflection, since apparently you’re the only person you care about.”

Somewhere in the middle are those who grudgingly wear masks, but still feel a gnawing unease.

But according to experts, there are fundamental reasons why masks make people uncomfortable, ranging from their historical links to crime and disease, to how they change human interaction.


Masks can make it difficult to hear what people are saying, dampen down empathy responses and leave people unable to make quick judgments about whether to trust an approaching stranger. They can even invoke a sense of humiliation and shame.

Dr Becky Spelman, psychologist and clinical director of the Private Therapy Clinic in Harley Street, argues that being unable to read facial expressions properly can be ‘extremely anxiety provoking.’

“Because masks have been worn by burglars and people who commit crimes, sometimes there is a fear reaction, or an anxious reaction, when we can’t see someone’s face,” she said.

“It also diminishes trust. It’s very hard to trust people when we can’t see what facial expression they are making fully. We don’t know if someone is being friendly towards us.

“We’re having to work so much harder to try and find out people’s intentions and that is extremely anxiety provoking and frustrating for people.”

Research has shown that patients feel less empathy from doctors and dentists who wear masks during treatment.

Dr Dimitrios Tsivrikos, a Consumer and Business Psychologist at University College London (UCL), said the same effect will make shops and public transport seem far less friendly while masks are compulsory.

“How we psychologically view each other is very much about seeing the face,” he said,

“People are looking for small micro-movements around the mouth particularly. You might come across someone on the Tube and you’re wary of them and then they crack a smile and you feel ok, so we use faces to feel safe.

“There have been loads of studies when people view only a part of one’s face they struggle to communicate. We need the whole face to decode the emotions.”


Digby Tantan, Clinical Professor of Psychotherapy at the University of Sheffield, believes that the brain is constantly working hard to pick up tiny micro-signals that communicate what a person is thinking.

People tend to read faces differently, so those who rely on the lower face for such signals will struggle with masks more than people who tend to look at the eyes.

Studies have also shown that when looking at angry or fearful faces, the eyes, nasolabial folds - which run from the nose to the edge of the lips - and the mouth draw a disproportionate amount of the gaze.

“There may be a general effect of discomfort because we cannot scan around another person's mouth, this is likely to mainly affect those people who normally spend more time scanning around the mouth of another person and rely on it for an update on whether or not they pose a threat,” he said.

Prof Tantam also believes face coverings have become culturally bound up with feelings of oppressive authority or religion, which may make people uncomfortable.


But he also thinks that there may be some truth in the pro-maskers arguments that those who refuse to comply may be less civic-minded and more likely to believe they are not an infection threat.

“If one's priority is to look after oneself and ignore others, there's no point to wearing a mask. If one is altruistically motivated, there is every point,” he added.

“Even more primitively, if one believes that one's body is pure but other people's bodies are contaminated, wearing a mask is an affront. If one accepts that one can be as readily contaminated or infected as everyone else, wearing a mask is the obvious public health thing to do.”

Unlike other countries, Britain has been slow on the uptake of masks. According to YouGov, just 38 per cent of people were wearing masks in public before new legislation was enacted, compared to 88 per cent of people in Spain in 90 per cent in Singapore.

Polling shows that the main reason for people wearing a mask is that they believe there is little risk to themselves or for other people. Britons have also complained about feeling silly wearing a mask, while others believe it makes people think they have the virus.

Confusion about when and where to wear masks is also adding to non-compliance, say behavioural experts. And politicians continue to send out mixed messages.

Dr Sander van der Linden, social psychologist on the faculty in the Department of Psychology at the University of Cambridge, said: “Most people have not seen politicians wearing a mask, so there is a lack of clear signalling and good role models, and it doesn’t appear mandatory.

“The communication has been quite confusing. People do understand you have to wear it on transport but they don’t seem to be fully aware that it’s mandatory in shops and enclosed spaces.”

However in Scotland, where masks became compulsory two weeks earlier that in Britain there are signs that people are getting used to the idea.

Stephen Reicher, Professor of Social Psychology at the University of St Andrews, said that masks had initially been treated with suspicion, but widespread compliance had led to people feeling more comfortable.

“Masks can invoke a sense of humiliation and shame – if I cover I must have something shameful I don’t want people to see,” he said.

“I remember the first time I wore a mask. A man pauses before he goes into a shop, covers his face, walks in. Traditionally that would signify danger. It would mark me out as someone dangerous and disreputable.

“It felt odd. But of course rather than flinching, the shop staff were extra friendly because my mask protected them. The meaning and identity changed from ‘danger’ and ‘outlaw’ to ‘safety’ and ‘friend’.

“The change can happen very quickly… in Scotland the sense is very much ‘what was the fuss all about’? Same with seatbelts. Now it feels very odd not to wear them.”

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:31 am
by ovalball
eldanielfire wrote:
Nolanator wrote:I don't, I ignore him, but loads of others directly interact with him and otherwise interesting threads become unreadable.
Globby had the same effect, but would just talk about himself rather than argue with everyone about trivial shit.
I'm starting to get the impression people love winding him up. And yeah going back to Globby, people moaned about his shite but where drawn to his thread destroying posts like Flies to shit.
I quite enjoyed taking the piss out of him - but it soon gets boring.

Probably best not to respond to him at all - despite his claims otherwise, he would post much less if no one acknowledged him.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:47 am
by eldanielfire
Rinkals wrote:
Nolanator wrote:He has been, we were keeping an eye to see how bed behave, but he was busy polluting threads again.

I don't understand why people bother to engage him.
Because if you don't, his version of events is never challenged and becomes accepted.

I was thinking about why CP failed, and I came to the conclusion that, with so many posters slapping each other's backs, there was very little robust discussion and much of the conversation was just bland, and I think if you just accept a ludicrous position without confronting it, then the discourse loses value.

Jerpy, and others of his ilk, were pretty hard on you if you posted something stupid in the old days and I think that kept the discussion honest; if you indulged in the sort of narcissism that characterises a lot of Bimbo's posts, you'd pretty soon get taken down a peg or two.

I'm not Jerpy and I'm nowhere near as effective in this as some other posters on here, but, if the new bored is to survive, it needs posters who are prepared to engage with insight and intelligence (of which I mostly, sadly, lack) and are not afraid to give their opinions.

Wishy-washy won't cut it.
I think this is a bit rose tinted. Back in the days jerpy constantly attacked posted and many believed abused his mod position to make these attacks a one way battle. It's an easy way to look good when you never or rarely volunteer opinion or start a discussion, but only post to rip holes at others. In balance he could also be viciously funny. However in ways many would deem out of order or offensive these days in a way the board wouldn't accept. Also jerpy got into plenty of shite fests, often with the entire contingent of posters from other countries going on and on for days. Different to Bimbo but similar, he also got way more personnel with posters than Bimbo has ever done. Bimbo for his part just categorizes people as capitalists and marxists e.g. good or bad however simplistic that is.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:47 am
by Nolanator
Rinkals wrote:
Nolanator wrote:He has been, we were keeping an eye to see how bed behave, but he was busy polluting threads again.

I don't understand why people bother to engage him.
Because if you don't, his version of events is never challenged and becomes accepted.

I was thinking about why CP failed, and I came to the conclusion that, with so many posters slapping each other's backs, there was very little robust discussion and much of the conversation was just bland, and I think if you just accept a ludicrous position without confronting it, then the discourse loses value.

Jerpy, and others of his ilk, were pretty hard on you if you posted something stupid in the old days and I think that kept the discussion honest; if you indulged in the sort of narcissism that characterises a lot of Bimbo's posts, you'd pretty soon get taken down a peg or two.

I'm not Jerpy and I'm nowhere near as effective in this as some other posters on here, but, if the new bored is to survive, it needs posters who are prepared to engage with insight and intelligence (of which I mostly, sadly, lack) and are not afraid to give their opinions.

Wishy-washy won't cut it.
Loons like that won't have their opinion accepted. Just let them piss into the wind by themselves. I prefer the Sefton style of "fudge off, you dishonest, scientifically illiterate cunt" than trying to genuinely interact. But I prefer starving them of oxygen above even that. Bimbo/Silver etc aren't going to case people here to change their behaviour IRL for the worse and won't stop posting shit, so there's nothing to be gained by interacting.

CP had a very low regular user count, as everyone came back here immediately once the panic was over. Only the loons stayed, precisely because no-one here took them seriously or engaged for very long. Hence it became a loony bin.
NPR still seems to have a relatively healthy regular user base and ASMO is keen to keep the place running as long as it's viable. We'll see how it pans out, but for now, it's got a decent atmosphere, so there's no point in allowing that kind of pointless toxic arguing to take root.


Anyhoo, not the thread for it.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:03 am
by kiwinoz
US Doctors give a different view to big Pharma. Banned by FB, YT and Google the best copy is on Brietbart. Where the correct HQC with Zinc etc is used it seems to have huge results.

Listen to the doctor at 5:25. If she is correct then we are being misled , if she is lying she should be deregistered. But the success rate, if true, is incredible.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/ ... onference/

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:26 am
by MungoMan
kiwinoz wrote:US Doctors give a different view to big Pharma. Banned by FB, YT and Google the best copy is on Brietbart. Where the correct HQC with Zinc etc is used it seems to have huge results.

Listen to the doctor at 5:25. If she is correct then we are being misled , if she is lying she should be deregistered. But the success rate, if true, is incredible.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/ ... onference/
Executive summary: faecebook, tw@tter and pootube removed stuff that originated from barfbot and runs counter to their protocols regarding covid misinfo. So barfbot is packing a sad.

Truly tragic. They are literally Stalin.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:39 am
by 6.Jones
Harveys wrote:
4071 wrote:
Harveys wrote:It’s like an antifa episode of Kath & Kim :lol:
Antifa?

In what way?
You do get that was a joke?
Yep, everyone knows which side of the culture wars masks are mainly worn on.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:46 am
by 6.Jones
kiwinoz wrote:US Doctors give a different view to big Pharma. Banned by FB, YT and Google the best copy is on Brietbart. Where the correct HQC with Zinc etc is used it seems to have huge results.

Listen to the doctor at 5:25. If she is correct then we are being misled , if she is lying she should be deregistered. But the success rate, if true, is incredible.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/ ... onference/
Who is doing the silencing of these 'thousands of physicians'? Big pharma? The deep state? The CDC? The mainstream media? The Trump administration? Every world government? The WHO? All these forces of evil, working together, in an axis of disinformation?

Or is it just another conspiracy theory? I always get these fifty:fifty bets wrong.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:49 am
by MungoMan
6.Jones wrote:
Harveys wrote:
4071 wrote:
Harveys wrote:It’s like an antifa episode of Kath & Kim :lol:
Antifa?

In what way?
You do get that was a joke?
Yep, everyone knows which side of the culture wars masks are mainly worn on.
He was a small time politician
Or a tele-prompter's charge trying to
Bury a misdeed from way back when
And so he lined all of the
Hacks up on the grass
Called them gentlemen and friends
Gave his dog whistle a blast
And every face there was a mask
What is anybody doing who ain't pretending?
What is anybody doing
Why would he frighten off his friends
With something useless as the truth?


Still in Buggeritup, groucho, or did a late night jet flight spirit you away to a dacha in the boreal forests?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:53 am
by 4071
kiwinoz wrote:A very small number of US Doctors, none of whom are virologists, give a different view to the majority of US doctors and experts in the field, as well as big Pharma. Banned by FB, YT and Google the worst copy is on Brietbart. Where the correct HQC with Zinc etc is used it seems to have huge results, as confirmed by anecdote, rather than any actual testing.

Listen to the doctor at 5:25. If she is correct then we are being misled , if she is lying she should be deregistered. But the success rate, if true, is incredible. In the literal sense of the word.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/ ... onference/
A couple of edits for the sake of accuracy.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:59 am
by Mr Mike
eldanielfire wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
An Arkansas senator who shared an article that described the coronavirus pandemic as a “hoax” has contracted Covid-19.

Republican senator Jason Rapert, who unsuccessfully introduced a bill to ban gay marriage in the US in 2017, was hospitalised with coronavirus and pneumonia on 24 July.

Earlier in the year, as many states were beginning to take social distancing measures to attempt to control the spread of the virus, Mr Rapert shared an article on Facebook that called the pandemic the “biggest political hoax in history”.
Funny how many anti-Pandemic idiots get the Coronavirus isn't it?
Must be very annoying for pro-pandemic folks.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:08 pm
by eldanielfire
Mr Mike wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
An Arkansas senator who shared an article that described the coronavirus pandemic as a “hoax” has contracted Covid-19.

Republican senator Jason Rapert, who unsuccessfully introduced a bill to ban gay marriage in the US in 2017, was hospitalised with coronavirus and pneumonia on 24 July.

Earlier in the year, as many states were beginning to take social distancing measures to attempt to control the spread of the virus, Mr Rapert shared an article on Facebook that called the pandemic the “biggest political hoax in history”.
Funny how many anti-Pandemic idiots get the Coronavirus isn't it?
Must be very annoying for pro-pandemic folks.
:lol:

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:16 pm
by 6.Jones
MungoMan wrote:
6.Jones wrote:
Harveys wrote:
4071 wrote:
Harveys wrote:It’s like an antifa episode of Kath & Kim :lol:
Antifa?

In what way?
You do get that was a joke?
Yep, everyone knows which side of the culture wars masks are mainly worn on.
He was a small time politician
Or a tele-prompter's charge trying to
Bury a misdeed from way back when
And so he lined all of the
Hacks up on the grass
Called them gentlemen and friends
Gave his dog whistle a blast
And every face there was a mask
What is anybody doing who ain't pretending?
What is anybody doing
Why would he frighten off his friends
With something useless as the truth?


Still in Buggeritup, groucho, or did a late night jet flight spirit you away to a dacha in the boreal forests?
Oh, how I dream of a night in the boreal dacha with antifa Karen. :thumbup:

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:19 pm
by 6.Jones
eldanielfire wrote:
Mr Mike wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
The Optimist wrote:
An Arkansas senator who shared an article that described the coronavirus pandemic as a “hoax” has contracted Covid-19.

Republican senator Jason Rapert, who unsuccessfully introduced a bill to ban gay marriage in the US in 2017, was hospitalised with coronavirus and pneumonia on 24 July.

Earlier in the year, as many states were beginning to take social distancing measures to attempt to control the spread of the virus, Mr Rapert shared an article on Facebook that called the pandemic the “biggest political hoax in history”.
Funny how many anti-Pandemic idiots get the Coronavirus isn't it?
Must be very annoying for pro-pandemic folks.
:lol:
Actually, I was wondering how few of them get it. Sen. Rapert could have his own verse in "Isn't It Ironic".

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:27 pm
by happyhooker
Point of order. Almost nothing in that song is actually ironic

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:32 pm
by eldanielfire
happyhooker wrote:Point of order. Almost nothing in that song is actually ironic
Not even "It's like Raaaiiiiiinnnnn on your wedding day"?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:35 pm
by Nolanator
happyhooker wrote:Point of order. Almost nothing in that song is actually ironic
Is it ironic that it's named as such, in a meta-irony way?

What should it be called, Redundant?