Page 886 of 1526

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:46 pm
by clementinfrance
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:51 am The UK has contributed more to the vaccine cause than all of the 27 EU member states combined. But don't let that get in the way of your rant.
Absolute horseshit...
Germany and the USA were the largest investors in vaccine R&D, according to the latest research by @GHC_IHEID

With investments of €1.5bn & €2.2bn respectively,
Germany & the USA were responsible for over half of the €5.9bn invested in developing COVID vaccines
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/vaccines-RD

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
by bimboman
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that relay is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
by DAC_
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:46 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:51 am The UK has contributed more to the vaccine cause than all of the 27 EU member states combined. But don't let that get in the way of your rant.
Absolute horseshit...
Germany and the USA were the largest investors in vaccine R&D, according to the latest research by @GHC_IHEID

With investments of €1.5bn & €2.2bn respectively,
Germany & the USA were responsible for over half of the €5.9bn invested in developing COVID vaccines
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/vaccines-RD
How much have France donated?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:49 pm
by iarmhiman
Magpie26 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 10:32 am Is anyone in the EU actually going to be held accountable for the mess they have made of the vaccination rollout?

There is clearly a lot of 'blame game' both internally and externally going on but is there anyone actually accountable for the situation?
Its easy to say the blame ends at the top but I don't know how much input UVDL really had into the supply agreements, collective purchasing, roll out planning?

Why do you care?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:50 pm
by inactionman
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:46 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:51 am The UK has contributed more to the vaccine cause than all of the 27 EU member states combined. But don't let that get in the way of your rant.
Absolute horseshit...
Germany and the USA were the largest investors in vaccine R&D, according to the latest research by @GHC_IHEID

With investments of €1.5bn & €2.2bn respectively,
Germany & the USA were responsible for over half of the €5.9bn invested in developing COVID vaccines
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/vaccines-RD
:thumbup:

Well done to the US for investing in a for-profit vaccine. Good businessmen

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:51 pm
by clementinfrance
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:46 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:51 am The UK has contributed more to the vaccine cause than all of the 27 EU member states combined. But don't let that get in the way of your rant.
Absolute horseshit...
Germany and the USA were the largest investors in vaccine R&D, according to the latest research by @GHC_IHEID

With investments of €1.5bn & €2.2bn respectively,
Germany & the USA were responsible for over half of the €5.9bn invested in developing COVID vaccines
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/vaccines-RD
How much have France donated?
Irrelevant as I'm not making any false, stupid, flag-waving claims...

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:53 pm
by DAC_
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:46 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:51 am The UK has contributed more to the vaccine cause than all of the 27 EU member states combined. But don't let that get in the way of your rant.
Absolute horseshit...
Germany and the USA were the largest investors in vaccine R&D, according to the latest research by @GHC_IHEID

With investments of €1.5bn & €2.2bn respectively,
Germany & the USA were responsible for over half of the €5.9bn invested in developing COVID vaccines
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/vaccines-RD
How much have France donated?
Irrelevant as I'm not making any false, stupid, flag-waving claims...
Look at the figures and flags on the link I gave.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:54 pm
by bimboman
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
clementinfrance wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:46 pm
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:51 am The UK has contributed more to the vaccine cause than all of the 27 EU member states combined. But don't let that get in the way of your rant.
Absolute horseshit...
Germany and the USA were the largest investors in vaccine R&D, according to the latest research by @GHC_IHEID

With investments of €1.5bn & €2.2bn respectively,
Germany & the USA were responsible for over half of the €5.9bn invested in developing COVID vaccines
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/vaccines-RD
How much have France donated?
Irrelevant as I'm not making any false, stupid, flag-waving claims...


So Germany want their return. Rubbish the opposition.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
by inactionman
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:57 pm
by bimboman
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.

Ok, how many under 18’s have died with Covid in the U.K.?

How many of them had no other co morbidity ?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pm
by not_english
My kids have had 3 different shots in the last week. Can't get worked up about vaccinating them against coronavirus. You have to consent for them to be given the jab.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:04 pm
by bimboman
not_english wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pm My kids have had 3 different shots in the last week. Can't get worked up about vaccinating them against coronavirus. You have to consent for them to be given the jab.

You can’t get worked up vaccinating your children with something they don’t medically require !

Wow.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:19 pm
by not_english
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:04 pm
not_english wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pm My kids have had 3 different shots in the last week. Can't get worked up about vaccinating them against coronavirus. You have to consent for them to be given the jab.

You can’t get worked up vaccinating your children with something they don’t medically require !

Wow.
No, one of their jabs was HPV, a virus that as boys they won't suffer from. It is a similar idea with Covid, if they don't catch it, they won't spread it to someone who will suffer from it.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:32 pm
by bimboman
not_english wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:19 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:04 pm
not_english wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pm My kids have had 3 different shots in the last week. Can't get worked up about vaccinating them against coronavirus. You have to consent for them to be given the jab.

You can’t get worked up vaccinating your children with something they don’t medically require !

Wow.
No, one of their jabs was HPV, a virus that as boys they won't suffer from. It is a similar idea with Covid, if they don't catch it, they won't spread it to someone who will suffer from it.

Boys can get throat cancer from HPV. It’s a sensible move.

The vaccines don’t always “stop” catching , they make the symptoms more mild.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:58 pm
by DragsterDriver
iarmhiman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:49 pm
Magpie26 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 10:32 am Is anyone in the EU actually going to be held accountable for the mess they have made of the vaccination rollout?

There is clearly a lot of 'blame game' both internally and externally going on but is there anyone actually accountable for the situation?
Its easy to say the blame ends at the top but I don't know how much input UVDL really had into the supply agreements, collective purchasing, roll out planning?

Why do you care?
For the same reason you care about our 19% corporation tax?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:59 pm
by DragsterDriver
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.
Oddly- isn’t obesity a massive risk factor with covid?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:02 pm
by message #2527204
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:57 pm
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.

Ok, how many under 18’s have died with Covid in the U.K.?

How many of them had no other co morbidity ?
Well that is kinda the point. You have to be able to prove you can safely use a vaccine on kids in order to safely use it on the vulnerable kids.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:07 pm
by inactionman
DragsterDriver wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:59 pm
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.
Oddly- isn’t obesity a massive risk factor with covid?
I think obesity is an aggravating factor in many conditions - getting a trimmer population helps across many, many things, but it's proving a very difficult thing to achieve despite concerted efforts over many years.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:12 pm
by message #2527204
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:07 pm
DragsterDriver wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:59 pm
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.
Oddly- isn’t obesity a massive risk factor with covid?
I think obesity is an aggravating factor in many conditions - getting a trimmer population helps across many, many things, but it's proving a very difficult thing to achieve despite concerted efforts over many years.
Bloody Trussel trust :x

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:22 pm
by eldanielfire
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:03 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:53 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:51 pm
Good news on the pfizer vaccine and kids aged 12-15.

If you tolerate this ,

Then your kids will be next.


You’re a monster.
I missed this. Who is proposing this as a good idea?


They’re currently testing the vaccine on children, poster above celebrating that ....

It’s revolting.

And dangerous.
It's not dangerous, as many studies have shown. All medicines were tested on children at some point. Only an idiot would oppose giving children life saving medicine.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:26 pm
by bimboman
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:22 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:03 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:53 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:51 pm
Good news on the pfizer vaccine and kids aged 12-15.

If you tolerate this ,

Then your kids will be next.


You’re a monster.
I missed this. Who is proposing this as a good idea?


They’re currently testing the vaccine on children, poster above celebrating that ....

It’s revolting.

And dangerous.
It's not dangerous, as many studies have shown. All medicines were tested on children at some point. Only an idiot would oppose giving children life saving medicine.


Only an idiot would give a medicine that carries risk to protect against a virus that carries none,

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:31 pm
by Yer Man
Edinburgh01 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:56 am
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:46 am It hadn't occurred to me that there would be regional variances - obvious now I've seen it stated - so wondering if some of the reported side effects might be regional or more significant in certain genetic populations.
It is not quite the same thing, but Africa is more genetically diverse than the rest of the planet. According to a BBC (so must be true) documentary, the population that left Africa, and from whom we are all descended, was more genetically homogenous than the population that stayed behind. The result is that even today there is more genetic diversity amongst the African or African descended populations.
There are a couple of tribes in Africa, living in neighbouring valleys, that are more genetically different than any two races living outside Africa

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:42 pm
by message #2527204
Edinburgh01 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:40 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:12 pm Judge demands that Belgium scraps all corona measures within thirty days

The Brussels court of first instance orders the Belgian government to end the corona measures within thirty days, on pain of a penalty of 5000 euros per day. According to the judge, the current measures are based on laws that cannot serve as the basis for the ministerial decisions by which the corona measures are issued.

https://www.ad.nl/buitenland/rechter-ei ... ps://t.co/
A court in Scotland ruled the restrictions on church services amounted to an unreasonable infringement to religious rights.
That really is out of order. Believe in invisible beings? - then fudge the rest of the population. This religious exceptionalism is f**king ridiculous, they should have no more 'rights' than normal humans.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:53 pm
by eldanielfire
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:26 pm
Only an idiot would give a medicine that carries risk to protect against a virus that carries none,
Did you just claim COVID-19 carries no risk? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:56 pm
by bimboman
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:53 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:26 pm
Only an idiot would give a medicine that carries risk to protect against a virus that carries none,
Did you just claim COVID-19 carries no risk? :lol: :lol: :lol:


For children with no pre conditions ..... which was the group being discussed.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm
by eldanielfire
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:56 pm
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:53 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:26 pm
Only an idiot would give a medicine that carries risk to protect against a virus that carries none,
Did you just claim COVID-19 carries no risk? :lol: :lol: :lol:


For children with no pre conditions ..... which was the group being discussed.
Yes and those with pre-conditions will likely be vulnerable to other children carrying it.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm
by CM11
bimbo doing a complete anti vax routine I see.

In general the risk to a child getting a vaccine is minimal in terms of what they're being vaccinated against so it's taken as a collective responsibility to stop the spread of the virus so vulnerable, compromised people, not all of whom can take vaccines, are protected.

One of the reasons anti vaccination has grown in educated communities is because selfish parents have looked at the marginal risks both from the disease and vaccination and have refused to take the vaccination 'just in case'.

I do have slight concerns about mass vaccination of children with such a new vaccine, tbf, but that's a separate point and one which I'm sure I'll be reassured on by the time our kids are eligible.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:06 pm
by bimboman
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:56 pm
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:53 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:26 pm
Only an idiot would give a medicine that carries risk to protect against a virus that carries none,
Did you just claim COVID-19 carries no risk? :lol: :lol: :lol:


For children with no pre conditions ..... which was the group being discussed.
Yes and those with pre-conditions will likely be vulnerable to other children carrying it.


Those with pre conditions can be separately treated and possibly vaccinated. Mass vaccination of the extreme healthy to protect no one is stupid,

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:10 pm
by bimboman
bimbo doing a complete anti vax routine I see.

Wow, that’s a huge misrepresentation. Being anti certain treatments on certain populations isn’t anti vaccine , it’s sensible.

Taking an artificial immunisation to something the immune system can cope with and get long lasting learnt immunity for is stupid stuff.


I take vaccines , my children are fully vaccinated (and have chosen non mandatory ones for both them and myself).

You’ve no actual thoughts around the subject and should really just stay out .

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:21 pm
by AND-y
:lol: This thick fudge

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:21 pm
by eldanielfire
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:06 pm
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:56 pm
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:53 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:26 pm
Only an idiot would give a medicine that carries risk to protect against a virus that carries none,
Did you just claim COVID-19 carries no risk? :lol: :lol: :lol:


For children with no pre conditions ..... which was the group being discussed.
Yes and those with pre-conditions will likely be vulnerable to other children carrying it.


Those with pre conditions can be separately treated and possibly vaccinated. Mass vaccination of the extreme healthy to protect no one is stupid,
So your a) rejecting the idea of herd immunity which will also reduce the chances of COVID mutating to a new, more dangerous variant b) Ignoring those with prior health conditions among other kids may not be able to get vaccinated for a variety of reasons.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:25 pm
by eldanielfire
CM11 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm bimbo doing a complete anti vax routine I see.
Bimboman doesn't believe in testing new medicines on children. I guess he is against kids ever getting medicine I guess as it was all tested on children at some point. But that's logic, something that Bimbo merely thinks is ideology
In general the risk to a child getting a vaccine is minimal in terms of what they're being vaccinated against so it's taken as a collective responsibility to stop the spread of the virus so vulnerable, compromised people, not all of whom can take vaccines, are protected.

One of the reasons anti vaccination has grown in educated communities is because selfish parents have looked at the marginal risks both from the disease and vaccination and have refused to take the vaccination 'just in case'.

I do have slight concerns about mass vaccination of children with such a new vaccine, tbf, but that's a separate point and one which I'm sure I'll be reassured on by the time our kids are eligible.
No new medical is without risk. In fact nothing ever is. However in numerous times in the past century we have mass vaccinated children and as a result child mortality has dropped massively. And when we get pockets resisting mass vaccination we get great incidents of disease and it's consequences. These vaccines are safe and mass vaccination is even safer.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:27 pm
by DragsterDriver
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:07 pm
DragsterDriver wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:59 pm
inactionman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:48 pm
I'm not sure medical experts dealing with coronovirus have the time to fight inner city crime.

Your point about proportionality is valid, but you're a brave man saying it's negligible. There's also the issue of eradicating the virus in key carriers, although that really is a thorny ethical debate.

It’s about what’s actually dangerous rather than politically desirable.

And negligible is absolutely the correct term for the under 19’s ....


As your right about crime fighting let’s get them working on obesity where they'd make a real difference .
Again, let's treat obesity and coronavirus as the two separate thing they are. We don't need to horse-trade here.
Oddly- isn’t obesity a massive risk factor with covid?
I think obesity is an aggravating factor in many conditions - getting a trimmer population helps across many, many things, but it's proving a very difficult thing to achieve despite concerted efforts over many years.
The problem as I see it is all the ‘get active’ stuff leads people to think they can out train a poor diet- They can’t. Couple of Zumba classes won’t sort out endless pizza, crisps and chocolate.

Also shite food tastes the best and is cheap. Massive problem for society.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:27 pm
by Mick Mannock
CM11 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm bimbo doing a complete anti vax routine I see.
No he hasn't.

You are lying.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:32 pm
by bimboman
AND-y wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:21 pm :lol: This thick fudge


How about voter Id commie?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:36 pm
by bimboman
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:21 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:06 pm
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm
bimboman wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:56 pm
eldanielfire wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:53 pm

Did you just claim COVID-19 carries no risk? :lol: :lol: :lol:


For children with no pre conditions ..... which was the group being discussed.
Yes and those with pre-conditions will likely be vulnerable to other children carrying it.


Those with pre conditions can be separately treated and possibly vaccinated. Mass vaccination of the extreme healthy to protect no one is stupid,
So your a) rejecting the idea of herd immunity which will also reduce the chances of COVID mutating to a new, more dangerous variant b) Ignoring those with prior health conditions among other kids may not be able to get vaccinated for a variety of reasons.

No, actually you’re rejecting the idea of herd immunity. Children have immunity due to a functional immune system, it’s best they are naturally immune than artificially.

Mutations are in their 1,000’s already. They’re more likely to occur to avoid the vaccinated if we believe in evolutionary advantages.

Btw we are almost into the multiple hundreds on these deadly variants now.how will we cope,

Variants are already in the their thousands.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:50 pm
by TheFrog
DAC_ wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:42 pm
TheFrog wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:39 pm
AND-y wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:06 pm YOU did fudge all. FFS.
He did wave his dick while other in the country worked on saving the UK and the world.
It's being waved because of yours and others attitudes towards the UK.
Unless you are the UK, I don't think I have any attitude toward the UK...

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 6:04 pm
by CM11
Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:27 pm
CM11 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm bimbo doing a complete anti vax routine I see.
No he hasn't.

You are lying.
He is mimicking the anti vax argument. Whether he means to or not.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 6:09 pm
by inactionman
CM11 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 6:04 pm :D
Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:27 pm
CM11 wrote: Wed Mar 31, 2021 5:01 pm bimbo doing a complete anti vax routine I see.
No he hasn't.

You are lying.
He is mimicking the anti vax argument. Whether he means to or not.
Not sure he's quite gone the full Wakefield on this, although I disagree with his conclusion that there's no need to think about vaccinating children.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2021 6:10 pm
by DAC_
I hear there is a new French variant in Paris, apparently Macron is going to address the French public tonight? No link, as yet, to back this up.

I will be buying some Quiche tomorrow in solidarity.