Page 1174 of 1526

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 2:25 pm
by message #2527204
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 2:15 pm https://www.thelocal.de/20211015/superm ... accinated/
Supermarkets in German state of Hesse can now block entry to the unvaccinated
Which is nice.
I did tell you it would be a business choice. If they think they'll get more custom either one way or the other, they'll do it.
Policing it will be fun.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:18 pm
by DAC_
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-58153616
Covid travel rules relaxed for overseas delegates
It would appear that 25,000 important people don't need to be vaccinated.

Can someone explain why?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:29 pm
by Mick Mannock

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:30 pm
by Mick Mannock
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:18 pm https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-58153616
Covid travel rules relaxed for overseas delegates
It would appear that 25,000 important people don't need to be vaccinated.

Can someone explain why?
Thee and me.

Totally bent IMO.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:31 pm
by RodneyRegis
One would have thought that the people with most knowledge about what was really going on would be first in line to get their jabs. Weird.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:34 pm
by DAC_
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... n=sharebar
Leicester mum-of-three dies after receiving AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine
Important people don't have to have it, right?

Think I'll wait a bit longer, thanks.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:36 pm
by Mick Mannock
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:34 pm https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... n=sharebar
Leicester mum-of-three dies after receiving AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine
Important people don't have to have it, right?

Think I'll wait a bit longer, thanks.
Anecdote!!!!

Nothing to see here

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:36 pm
by message #2527204
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:34 pm https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... n=sharebar
Leicester mum-of-three dies after receiving AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine
Important people don't have to have it, right?

Think I'll wait a bit longer, thanks.
Bought a lottery ticket tonight, DAC?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:40 pm
by Mick Mannock
message #2527204 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:36 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:34 pm https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... n=sharebar
Leicester mum-of-three dies after receiving AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine
Important people don't have to have it, right?

Think I'll wait a bit longer, thanks.
Bought a lottery ticket tonight, DAC?
Different sort of lottery.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:00 pm
by puku
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:29 pm Pharma gonna pharma

https://odysee.com/@DarkHorsePodcastCli ... rmectin1:8
There you go, just posting links that don't or maybe do align with your thinking eh Mick.

Tell me, do you agree with the idea that the link you posted is putting forward? Go on, don't sit on the fence.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:29 pm
by CM11
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:34 pm https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news ... n=sharebar
Leicester mum-of-three dies after receiving AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine
Important people don't have to have it, right?

Think I'll wait a bit longer, thanks.
An article from 4 months ago about an incident 6 months ago.

For balance can you post all the articles about healthy people ending up in ICU due to covid and passing away?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:30 pm
by bimboman
puku wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:00 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:29 pm Pharma gonna pharma

https://odysee.com/@DarkHorsePodcastCli ... rmectin1:8
There you go, just posting links that don't or maybe do align with your thinking eh Mick.

Tell me, do you agree with the idea that the link you posted is putting forward? Go on, don't sit on the fence.


While I have sympathy with your criticism, I’ll also point out that the ethical behaviour from big pharma makes my old industry look like angels.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:44 pm
by puku
bimboman wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:30 pm
puku wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:00 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 6:29 pm Pharma gonna pharma

https://odysee.com/@DarkHorsePodcastCli ... rmectin1:8
There you go, just posting links that don't or maybe do align with your thinking eh Mick.

Tell me, do you agree with the idea that the link you posted is putting forward? Go on, don't sit on the fence.


While I have sympathy with your criticism, I’ll also point out that the ethical behaviour from big pharma makes my old industry look like angels.
I agree mostly, especially when firms are hawking immunotherapy drugs that cost north of 200K per year and increase life in some cancer patients by 4 months. However, my argument with Mick above is a scientific one.

Image

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:55 pm
by jambanja
I knew someone, relatively young, 56, who died from a heart attack, this was shortly after eating a cheese and tomato sandwich, I’m not sure I’ll be having one of those anytime soon :roll:

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:02 pm
by RuggaBugga
Dozy wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 12:52 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 12:41 pm
Dozy wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 9:23 am
Davedj77 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 9:17 am
Dozy wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 9:12 am

Yes Mandarin speakers need to ensure Shakespearean English to prove themselves to you

Have you ever seen the quality of mandarin on even government level sites of international bodies?

This sums up your thinking. You've got serious issues. The world doesn't revolve around you and who you perceive as your people.
You dont know a thing about me. And you are the one with issues...lying about your family being sick to prove your bullshit point. That's so low. That's so small. So pathetic. Go on and try and have a life outside of this bored. It will do you good. Trust me.
Nuts 😂
He's got your number, you lying sack of shit.

How many family members again?
One immediate, one distant. Check all you like.

You are a piece of shit. Remember, anyone on this thread who never said anything when posters were discusing humans and non humans are seriously not valid options. You do not have a valid opinion. Your silence has you in group racist

Ok so one immediate and one distant. What were their made up issues again? Just for posterity.

You lying piece of shit.

P.S. you've been trotting it out for days now but someone asking whether a vaccine is approved for use in humans doesn't equate to labelling all non Westerners inhuman either you lying piece of shit.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm
by Mick Mannock
Unacceptable anecdote.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
by RuggaBugga
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:10 pm
by puku
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
Running away from simple questions...again. You know how that feels.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:23 pm
by Duff Paddy
Here’s one for all you anti vaxxers

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-a ... -1.4701513

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
by Mick Mannock
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:33 pm
by puku
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
Mick "Postman Pat" Mannock, innit

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:46 pm
by Mick Mannock

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:47 pm
by CM11
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
The article you only linked because you were prompted? Stop treating us like idiots. You knew exactly what you were doing.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:57 pm
by puku
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:46 pm Pharma gonna pharma

https://odysee.com/@ivermectine-covid.c ... re-Kory-:a
Pharmaceutical company in capitalism shocker.

Perhaps molnupiravir is also just a better drug at treating Covid-19.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 9:02 pm
by TheFrog
Official: the US lifting their travel ban for fully vaccinated people :thumbup:

Means my parents may finally get a chance to visit before they are too old.

And my kids can come and go when they have holidays.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:47 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:47 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
The article you only linked because you were prompted? Stop treating us like idiots. You knew exactly what you were doing.
Cm11,


Low hanging fruit, aside. Can you explain why the participants at the Glasgow summit don't need to have been vaccinated?

Thanks

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
by RuggaBugga
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
by DAC_
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:02 pm
by Mick Mannock
I will give an opinion.

Lori Lightfoot is an incompetent half-wit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Gg-TUTcXCw

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
by CM11
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm

"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
by CM11
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm

That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:12 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm

No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Do you even have an opinion on why important people don't need a vaccine (as shown) but we have too? Any opinion at all? Because, given your posting history on people having the vaccine, you should?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:24 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm

No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Any opinion at all? Any?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:36 pm
by CM11
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:12 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm

Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Do you even have an opinion on why important people don't need a vaccine (as shown) but we have too? Any opinion at all? Because, given your posting history on people having the vaccine, you should?
As I said, the reasons are given in the article.

I've already said to you that covid restrictions conflict and don't always make logical sense. We're about to open nightclubs but partners can't be there until the final seconds of labour. It's wrong but it is what it is. People are trying to do their best to not kill other people in the midst of a serious crisis. Mistakes will happen. Policy won't always make sense but if you're asking why people, allegedly, important to the future of the world are being treated differently than those they are acting on behalf of it would explain your selfish stance on vaccination.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:42 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:36 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:12 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm

Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Do you even have an opinion on why important people don't need a vaccine (as shown) but we have too? Any opinion at all? Because, given your posting history on people having the vaccine, you should?
As I said, the reasons are given in the article.

I've already said to you that covid restrictions conflict and don't always make logical sense. We're about to open nightclubs but partners can't be there until the final seconds of labour. It's wrong but it is what it is. People are trying to do their best to not kill other people in the midst of a serious crisis. Mistakes will happen. Policy won't always make sense but if you're asking why people, allegedly, important to the future of the world are being treated differently than those they are acting on behalf of it would explain your selfish stance on vaccination.
You're of the opinion, given your posting history, young children should have vaccinations, but people attending the conference shouldn't?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm
by CM11
Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:51 pm
by CM11
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:53 pm
by DAC_
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.
Pro vaxxers, gonna pro vax (apart from important people attending climate change conferences, of course)