Page 48 of 152

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
by MungoMan
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:20 pm https://twitter.com/melbprisoner/status ... 0003696641


It’s all going well then.
Another reminder why I hate tw@tter.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
by MungoMan
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:20 pm https://twitter.com/melbprisoner/status ... 0003696641


It’s all going well then.
Another reminder of why I hate tw@tter.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:26 pm
by bimboman
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:20 pm https://twitter.com/melbprisoner/status ... 0003696641


It’s all going well then.
Another reminder why I hate tw@tter.


I’m with you. That head stomp though needs prosecution.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:36 pm
by Farva
I dare say that police officer will be enjoying some quarantine time himself fairly soon

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:39 pm
by bimboman
Farva wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:36 pm I dare say that police officer will be enjoying some quarantine time himself fairly soon

Keep us up on this. Has he been identified yet?

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:43 pm
by MungoMan
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:26 pm
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:20 pm https://twitter.com/melbprisoner/status ... 0003696641


It’s all going well then.
Another reminder why I hate tw@tter.


I’m with you. That head stomp though needs prosecution.
It does and I hope it is forthcoming

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm
by Pat the Ex Mat
VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 pm
by Ellafan
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:43 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:26 pm
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:20 pm https://twitter.com/melbprisoner/status ... 0003696641


It’s all going well then.
Another reminder why I hate tw@tter.


I’m with you. That head stomp though needs prosecution.
It does and I hope it is forthcoming
I actually think the officer who deliberately drove the vehicle into him (after stopping) is more requiring of prosecution than the head stomp, although they both require gaol time.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:12 am
by Clogs
Ellafan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 pm
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:43 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:26 pm
MungoMan wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:24 pm
bimboman wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 12:20 pm https://twitter.com/melbprisoner/status ... 0003696641


It’s all going well then.
Another reminder why I hate tw@tter.


I’m with you. That head stomp though needs prosecution.
It does and I hope it is forthcoming
I actually think the officer who deliberately drove the vehicle into him (after stopping) is more requiring of prosecution than the head stomp, although they both require gaol time.
Vicpol are now trawling through his Facebook pages to see if there is anything there that may be contentious and thus render their actions justified.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:14 am
by Clogs
It is now illegal to sing in public in Melbourne. Or maybe he was arrested for too many flags?

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifestyle/ ... fd3ea27054

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:53 am
by MungoMan
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
They certainly have. And news has just come in of VicPol shooting (not fatally, it seems) some fella at Lilydale. Mind you, according to a non-police witness the fella was waving a large knife.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:19 am
by Clogs
MungoMan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:53 am
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
They certainly have. And news has just come in of VicPol shooting (not fatally, it seems) some fella at Lilydale. Mind you, according to a non-police witness the fella was waving a large knife.
The cops crashed a BBQ?

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am
by Farva
Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:31 am
by Clogs
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
Is this him the cop closest to the camera?



Image










It may or may not be him. I would go so far as to say it is highly unlikely that it is him.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:23 am
by CrazyIslander
MungoMan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:53 am
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
They certainly have. And news has just come in of VicPol shooting (not fatally, it seems) some fella at Lilydale. Mind you, according to a non-police witness the fella was waving a large knife.
Image

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:34 am
by Clogs
CrazyIslander wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:23 am
MungoMan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:53 am
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
They certainly have. And news has just come in of VicPol shooting (not fatally, it seems) some fella at Lilydale. Mind you, according to a non-police witness the fella was waving a large knife.
Image


Image

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:38 am
by Clogs
This is, in a nutshell, how fvcked up Melbourne has become. These boys can thank their lucky stars the cops didn't get wind of this covid breaching scheme, that coupled with no permit to sell could have seen them arrested, cuffed and head stomped by our fabulous Vicpol.


https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavir ... 098f27a03f

Coronavirus Victoria: Twitter user dobs in boys selling soft drinks from stall

A Melbourne man has been abused on social media after he “dobbed in” two young boys selling soft drinks and lollies from a stall.


Frank Chung
@franks_chung

SEPTEMBER 15, 20201:24PM

A Melbourne man has been hounded off social media after “dobbing in” kids selling drinks from a stall during coronavirus lockdown, suggesting the council send “someone down there”.
The man, who has since deleted his Twitter account, posted a photo over the weekend of two young boys sitting at a makeshift stall fashioned from an ironing board, selling cans of soft drink and lollies.
“Group of lads selling sweets and drinks for cash in Ramsden Reserve, during stage four lockdown is pretty silly in my humble opinion,” he said in the post, which tagged the Yarra Council Twitter handle.
“Maybe worth sending someone down there? They didn’t listen to me. Along the Yarra Trail walking track.”
The post drew hundreds of angry responses, with many criticising him for showing the children’s faces.
“OMG, arrest them immediately. Selling soft drinks and lollies on a sunny spring day, how dare they,” one person wrote.
Another said, “A grown man dobbing on a couple of kids for doing something completely harmless and posting their photo online is pretty silly in my humble opinion.”
Herald Sun columnist Rita Panahi linked to the tweet, writing, “Look at this hero dobbing in a couple of kids for supposedly breaking lockdown restrictions.”

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:40 am
by Slim 293
Clogs has gone completely Rupert...

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
by Ellafan
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:50 am
by Farva
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?
Havent heard. Hopefully the same fate.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:40 am
by Anonymous 1
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?
At the speed he hit the guy I doubt they will see that he did anything wrong. Doesn't seem to matter what country it is police seem to like beating up on people with mental health issues.

I think maybe the cops were upset that he had hit one of them and damaged the police car (before they hit him with it).

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:56 am
by Ellafan
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:40 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?
At the speed he hit the guy I doubt they will see that he did anything wrong. Doesn't seem to matter what country it is police seem to like beating up on people with mental health issues.

I think maybe the cops were upset that he had hit one of them and damaged the police car (before they hit him with it).
Or, possibly. there is a ding on the bonnet where they knocked him down, and (not knowing they had been videoed) lied about it in their report.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:00 am
by Slim 293
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:50 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?
Havent heard. Hopefully the same fate.
Both under criminal investigation I hear...

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:00 am
by Anonymous 1
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:56 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:40 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?
At the speed he hit the guy I doubt they will see that he did anything wrong. Doesn't seem to matter what country it is police seem to like beating up on people with mental health issues.

I think maybe the cops were upset that he had hit one of them and damaged the police car (before they hit him with it).
Or, possibly. there is a ding on the bonnet where they knocked him down, and (not knowing they had been videoed) lied about it in their report.
There is a massive sent in the car door

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:28 am
by Ellafan
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:00 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:56 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:40 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am
Farva wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:20 am Anyway, old stompy has been stood down pending an inquiry. One would assume prison is in his future.
What about the one driving the car?
At the speed he hit the guy I doubt they will see that he did anything wrong. Doesn't seem to matter what country it is police seem to like beating up on people with mental health issues.

I think maybe the cops were upset that he had hit one of them and damaged the police car (before they hit him with it).
Or, possibly. there is a ding on the bonnet where they knocked him down, and (not knowing they had been videoed) lied about it in their report.
There is a massive sent in the car door
If you are saying that he kicked the car door or somesuch, prior to the video starting, then that does not give the driver the right to use the car to knock him down.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:39 am
by Anonymous 1
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:28 am
If you are saying that he kicked the car door or somesuch, prior to the video starting, then that does not give the driver the right to use the car to knock him down.
The police are saying he hit a cop and damaged the car. I'm just speculating on why they gave him a punishment beating.
As far as the driver knocking him down is concerned I'm not so sure without the following beating that was such a bad option depending on what went on before.

He is a big lad and they tried to arrest him but we're unable to even though they sprayed him I don't know if they had tasers but they probably don't fancy tackling him or shooting him

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:41 am
by Clogs
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:28 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:00 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:56 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:40 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:56 am

What about the one driving the car?
At the speed he hit the guy I doubt they will see that he did anything wrong. Doesn't seem to matter what country it is police seem to like beating up on people with mental health issues.

I think maybe the cops were upset that he had hit one of them and damaged the police car (before they hit him with it).
Or, possibly. there is a ding on the bonnet where they knocked him down, and (not knowing they had been videoed) lied about it in their report.
There is a massive sent in the car door
If you are saying that he kicked the car door or somesuch, prior to the video starting, then that does not give the driver the right to use the car to knock him down.
He kicked the door. That is on video. He had also spent around 20 hours in emergency awaiting treatment which wasn't provided. He voluntarily went to hospital to get treatment.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:30 pm
by Ellafan
Clogs wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:41 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:28 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:00 am
Ellafan wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:56 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:40 am
At the speed he hit the guy I doubt they will see that he did anything wrong. Doesn't seem to matter what country it is police seem to like beating up on people with mental health issues.

I think maybe the cops were upset that he had hit one of them and damaged the police car (before they hit him with it).
Or, possibly. there is a ding on the bonnet where they knocked him down, and (not knowing they had been videoed) lied about it in their report.
There is a massive sent in the car door
If you are saying that he kicked the car door or somesuch, prior to the video starting, then that does not give the driver the right to use the car to knock him down.
He kicked the door. That is on video. He had also spent around 20 hours in emergency awaiting treatment which wasn't provided. He voluntarily went to hospital to get treatment.
That wasn't on any video I have seen Clogs. Link?

The damage on the door looked like a vehicle impact - the door pillar looked bent out of shape.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:31 pm
by towny
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
Exactly. This has happened a million times. This time someone filmed it.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:10 am
by Clogs
We now have our "Ring of Steel" back up. This is designed to keep Melburnians locked into the city and not escape. The Police Force has been deployed to set up heavily manned check points at all major arterials into and out of Melbourne.

https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavir ... ef56aac3f2


2020. :?

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:42 am
by Pat the Ex Mat
towny wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:31 pm
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
Exactly. This has happened a million times. This time someone filmed it.
There is a reason the Plod don't like being filmed (even though it's legal to do so)

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 2:10 am
by Ellafan
towny wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:31 pm
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
Exactly. This has happened a million times. This time someone filmed it.
Before mobile phones with cameras, the rozzers would organise their version of events on the way back to the station, and then all stick to that like glue. Even if was a bit pongy, the police sergeant prosecutors in the magistrates' courts didn't challenge it.

It is entirely possible (and subject to Clogs identifying this further video he says exists) that the allegation the victim "damaged" the car was their agreed version of why there is a ding in the bonnet, and they didn't know they'd been filmed when they sorted out the story at the hospital car park and reported it back to their superiors.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:25 am
by Anonymous 1
Ellafan wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 2:10 am
towny wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:31 pm
Pat the Ex Mat wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:28 pm VicPol have been like this far longer than these covid restrictions.
Exactly. This has happened a million times. This time someone filmed it.
Before mobile phones with cameras, the rozzers would organise their version of events on the way back to the station, and then all stick to that like glue. Even if was a bit pongy, the police sergeant prosecutors in the magistrates' courts didn't challenge it.

It is entirely possible (and subject to Clogs identifying this further video he says exists) that the allegation the victim "damaged" the car was their agreed version of why there is a ding in the bonnet, and they didn't know they'd been filmed when they sorted out the story at the hospital car park and reported it back to their superiors.
Come on they almost certainly are not accusing him of causing a "ding in the bonnet" just that rather obvious damage to the side of the car before he was hit with it. Lets just hope mobile phone footage gets better results in Australia than it often does in America.
Miami Police Union Says Cop Should Be "Commended" for Running Kick at Suspect's Head

The Miami Police Department has new union leadership, but its public statements remain as boneheaded as ever. Yesterday MPD Officer Mario Figueroa was acquitted of assault charges after he was filmed in May 2018 taking a running, football-punt-style kick at a handcuffed suspect's head. A judge ruled that because the kick actually missed, Figueroa didn't commit assault.

Miami Police Chief Jorge Colina yesterday told the Miami Herald that, even after the acquittal, he still doesn't think Figueroa should be a cop anymore. But MPD's Fraternal Order of Police, led by siblings Tommy and Matt Reyes, astoundingly chimed in on Twitter to say not only will the union defend him, but also Figueroa should be "commended" for his actions.

"It was going to be a kick and he deescalated as he was trained to do and pulled the kick," the person running the @MiamiFOP Twitter account wrote. "If anything he should be commended for his quick thinking and fast reflexes."


Video

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:27 am
by Ellafan
Anonymous 1 wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:25 am Come on they almost certainly are not accusing him of causing a "ding in the bonnet" just that rather obvious damage to the side of the car before he was hit with it.
The only people making that allegation are the police themselves as far as I can tell. It's part of the usual spin and rank-closing.
Dep Comm Paterson said the man was “running amongst traffic, (and) kicking a police vehicle”. “At one stage he hops on the bonnet of a police vehicle and then we see the police vehicle hit the man and then members tackle the man to the ground,” he said.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victor ... 13fe5c44fa
That emboldened bit is on any objective examination of the video, poppycock, and makes the kicking assertion look suspect.

Until they actually present some evidence backing up their version, it should be treated as concocted horseshit.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:40 am
by Anonymous 1
Ellafan wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:27 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:25 am Come on they almost certainly are not accusing him of causing a "ding in the bonnet" just that rather obvious damage to the side of the car before he was hit with it.
The only people making that allegation are the police themselves as far as I can tell. It's part of the usual spin and rank-closing.
Dep Comm Paterson said the man was “running amongst traffic, (and) kicking a police vehicle”. “At one stage he hops on the bonnet of a police vehicle and then we see the police vehicle hit the man and then members tackle the man to the ground,” he said.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victor ... 13fe5c44fa
That emboldened bit is on any objective examination of the video, poppycock, and makes the kicking assertion look suspect.

Until they actually present some evidence backing up their version, it should be treated as concocted horseshit.
For at least the second time I will tell you that I am not saying I believe the police version of events. Only that we can see the rather obvious damage to the police car before it's used to knock the man down. And anyway none of that really matters. It's not as if the guy will be charged with anything or any of his actions mitigate the actions of the copper who booted him in the head.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:52 pm
by Ellafan
Anonymous 1 wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:40 am Only that we can see the rather obvious damage to the police car
Are you familiar with what happens if you kick a (MOVING) vehicle - as opposed to that vision which looks like vehicle collision damage?

You might want to credit experience on this one anon.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:54 pm
by jdogscoop
It doesn't look good for either of them (and rightly so) with top brass coming out so early with this kind of media statement.
At a press conference, Deputy Commissioner Neil Paterson said he had viewed the footage online and footage from the body cameras of officers and concluded that it was an "inappropriate use of force by a police member with regard to the kick or the stomp to the head of the man involved in that incident".

"I've also formed the view that the use of force in using a police vehicle with the man involved in that incident is concerning," he said.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:57 pm
by Ellafan
The wagons are being circled, Jdog, with the usual denial of accountability.
[Paterson] described the man running among traffic, kicking a police car and hopping on its bonnet before being hit by the vehicle and tackled to the ground.

"We've got a man that's shown quite excessive violence at the hospital, smashed two large glass doors, taken them off their hinges and exited the hospital," Mr Paterson said.

"The police up there describe a situation where they thought this man will carjack a vehicle."

He added Mr Atkins was likely to be charged.

https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/st ... p/?cs=9676
The bullshit is piling up so high here, you need wings to stay over it.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:09 pm
by Anonymous 1
Ellafan wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:52 pm
Anonymous 1 wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:40 am Only that we can see the rather obvious damage to the police car
Are you familiar with what happens if you kick a (MOVING) vehicle - as opposed to that vision which looks like vehicle collision damage?

You might want to credit experience on this one anon.
For at least the third time and maybe the fourth time but most defiantly the last time I am telling you that I am not saying I believe the police version of events. As for experience of crash damage I have plenty but I don't know if he did or didn't do the damage to the police car. It should all come out and it's pretty much irrelevant anyway.

Re: Melbourne. Fvcked.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:21 pm
by Ellafan
Anonymous 1 wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:09 pm
Ellafan wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:52 pm
Anonymous 1 wrote: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:40 am Only that we can see the rather obvious damage to the police car
Are you familiar with what happens if you kick a (MOVING) vehicle - as opposed to that vision which looks like vehicle collision damage?

You might want to credit experience on this one anon.
For at least the third time and maybe the fourth time but most defiantly the last time I am telling you that I am not saying I believe the police version of events. As for experience of crash damage I have plenty but I don't know if he did or didn't do the damage to the police car. It should all come out and it's pretty much irrelevant anyway.
Just making sure you were agreeing to lock yourself in.