Chat Forum
It is currently Wed Jul 15, 2020 12:42 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29844 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364 ... 747  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1530
Enzedder wrote:
Quote:
#MeTooNZ: Govt considers ACC for workers traumatised by sexual harassment


Excellent work if this goes ahead - even better if they add bullying to the list of acceptable claims.

Companies invariably ignore both and sweep them under the table with faux investigations. Having an active ACC claim will hit them both in the pocket and force them to work with the affected staff member to put the situation right so that they can return.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/indust ... harassment

(It a long story so read it it you care; don't care if you don't)


:thumbup:
I agree that bullying should be included . if anything sexual harassment is a subset of Bullying .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1530
deadduck wrote:
Things would also end up being taxed more than once

E.g. Say you withdraw $1000 from the bank and use it to pay your gardener. They then bank it. Is that two transactions or one? If you just did a money transfer, would it be two transactions or one?

And if they don't bank it, but instead use it to pay the babysitter, and then the babysitter uses it to pay to get her nails done, and then the salon owner uses it to buy afternoon tea for her staff etc ... that money can go around and around in the cash economy avoiding your transaction tax. But if these things are done electronically, is the money taxed half a dozen times?


What's being discussed here is sounding a lot like a FTT/ Tobin tax .

Which if introduced comprehensively would eliminate GST completely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYtNwmXKIvM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:12 am
Posts: 8544
grouch wrote:
deadduck wrote:
Things would also end up being taxed more than once

E.g. Say you withdraw $1000 from the bank and use it to pay your gardener. They then bank it. Is that two transactions or one? If you just did a money transfer, would it be two transactions or one?

And if they don't bank it, but instead use it to pay the babysitter, and then the babysitter uses it to pay to get her nails done, and then the salon owner uses it to buy afternoon tea for her staff etc ... that money can go around and around in the cash economy avoiding your transaction tax. But if these things are done electronically, is the money taxed half a dozen times?


What's being discussed here is sounding a lot like a FTT/ Tobin tax .

Which if introduced comprehensively would eliminate GST completely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYtNwmXKIvM


Yeah but it won't be introduced. It just came out of the discussion about how to capture the GST on goods purchased online from overseas with a value <$400.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6072
Location: Vandean Coast
grouch wrote:
Enzedder wrote:
Quote:
#MeTooNZ: Govt considers ACC for workers traumatised by sexual harassment


Excellent work if this goes ahead - even better if they add bullying to the list of acceptable claims.

Companies invariably ignore both and sweep them under the table with faux investigations. Having an active ACC claim will hit them both in the pocket and force them to work with the affected staff member to put the situation right so that they can return.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/indust ... harassment

(It a long story so read it it you care; don't care if you don't)


:thumbup:
I agree that bullying should be included . if anything sexual harassment is a subset of Bullying .


Who decides what constitutes bullying? I reckon that'll be one thing that's very difficult to legislate around, how to tell the difference between genuine bullying and someone's hurt feelings or simply two people that don't like each other.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 1:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 180
deadduck wrote:
grouch wrote:
Enzedder wrote:
Quote:
#MeTooNZ: Govt considers ACC for workers traumatised by sexual harassment


Excellent work if this goes ahead - even better if they add bullying to the list of acceptable claims.

Companies invariably ignore both and sweep them under the table with faux investigations. Having an active ACC claim will hit them both in the pocket and force them to work with the affected staff member to put the situation right so that they can return.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/indust ... harassment

(It a long story so read it it you care; don't care if you don't)


:thumbup:
I agree that bullying should be included . if anything sexual harassment is a subset of Bullying .


Who decides what constitutes bullying? I reckon that'll be one thing that's very difficult to legislate around, how to tell the difference between genuine bullying and someone's hurt feelings or simply two people that don't like each other.

It's spelled out pretty clearly in the new work place health and safety legislation. In my recent dealings with a bully employee the labour dept were awesome and were right behind me making a move on the psychopath


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 3:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:58 am
Posts: 3365
I was accused of workplace bullying recently while training another employee. When asked by management I said I gave honest feedback without ad hominem attacks. Once they googled what ad hominem meant they asked me what was said. Both the accuser and I gave similar answers. I now have a new trainee and the last trainee has been given unpopular tasks 😂😂 luckily for me though the unhappy trainee was truthful about what was said, a more intelligent and manipulative person could easily have made things a lot more difficult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 4:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:20 am
Posts: 1560
Location: From the Hutt bro.
Kahu wrote:
I was accused of workplace bullying recently while training another employee. When asked by management I said I gave honest feedback without ad hominem attacks. Once they googled what ad hominem meant they asked me what was said. Both the accuser and I gave similar answers. I now have a new trainee and the last trainee has been given unpopular tasks 😂😂 luckily for me though the unhappy trainee was truthful about what was said, a more intelligent and manipulative person could easily have made things a lot more difficult.

Guess that's a good reason to have all feedback in written form (not always possible I know) just to cover yourself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 7:33 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10298
Location: Texas
I’m sure we can all come together (other than ENZ and Thai Guy) to congratulate Sir William.


Last edited by Mr Mike on Sun Jun 03, 2018 8:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19271
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left
I would rather all Pollys disqualify themselves from eligibility for these awards. They are already rewarded handsomely with their own gold plated trough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:16 am
Posts: 1873
Location: I raro i te maunga
Mr Mike wrote:
I’m sure we can all come together (other than ENZ) to congratulate Sir William.
Cold comfort for all the people sleeping in cars this winter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19271
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left
jono45 wrote:
Enzedder wrote:
I notice all the political supporters of the big shop owners and mall owners don't even mention the price gouging rents that NZ retailers have to pay for, and pass on the costs to their clients.

No

Far

King

Eye

Deer

So what planet do you live on ? Are these shop tenanted and do these businesses turn a.profit in the face of internet shopping


And that is why they have higher farking markups and struggle to compete with GST free internet sales - sheesh girls


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19271
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left
Mr Mike wrote:
I’m sure we can all come together (other than ENZ and Thai Guy) to congratulate Sir William.



You guys already all cum together over these things MM :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 3094
OK not politics but the Topp twins as DBE's :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
or whatever the Kiwi equivalent is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 9:26 pm 
Frankly I’m at a lost to understand the fragile state of our school buildings and grossly underfunded mental health system after the billions raised by flogging off our assets were pumped into them.

Gee makes you wonder don’t it ?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 9:39 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10298
Location: Texas
Glaston wrote:
OK not politics but the Topp twins as DBE's :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
or whatever the Kiwi equivalent is.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19271
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left
Now THOSE awards I can understand. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1530
Mr Mike wrote:
Glaston wrote:
OK not politics but the Topp twins as DBE's :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
or whatever the Kiwi equivalent is.

Image


:shock: :shock:
hell's bells , this could be political dynamite in the rural electorates.

Why?

Here we have the last Knighthoods for 10-12 years [ Labour abolishes Knigthoods , Gnats re-instate ] and alongside a couple of Rural icons , The Topp twins , we have the same honour being dished out to Double Dipton Bill ,thief , architect and guiding hand to some the biggest upf*ks in the country's history.

M Bovis , South Canterbury Finance, Christchurch[non] rebuild , infrastructure rundown , housing crisis , climate change denial ,etc , etc,etc .
Mind you , whomever drew up the list definitely doesn't hold Knighthoods as the ultimate pinnacle of our society's esteem.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12062840


Last edited by grouch on Mon Jun 04, 2018 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:58 am
Posts: 3365
eugenius wrote:
Frankly I’m at a lost to understand the fragile state of our school buildings and grossly underfunded mental health system after the billions raised by flogging off our assets were pumped into them.

Gee makes you wonder don’t it ?

This country is corrupt from the cabinet to the core. A change of government won't change a thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 2:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1439
Location: NZ
Good grief


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 2:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:14 am
Posts: 6850
Location: NZ
AD345 wrote:
Good grief

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 2:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 9:12 am
Posts: 8544
JB1981 wrote:
AD345 wrote:
Good grief

Image



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 4:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19271
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left
Is that Winston and Jacinda? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 4:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:14 am
Posts: 6850
Location: NZ
Enzedder wrote:
Is that Winston and Jacinda? :lol:

Probably. With the yellow and black it's also a good analogy for the Hurricanes season at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 5:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 32791
Location: in transit
Eug makes a good point about asset sales...

privatisation has resulted in savings and improved services where, exactly? When has that modern marvel of economic policy actually delivered a positive result for tax payers?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 5:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 2:38 am
Posts: 5156
Location: NZ
guy smiley wrote:
Eug makes a good point about asset sales...

privatisation has resulted in savings and improved services where, exactly? When has that modern marvel of economic policy actually delivered a positive result for tax payers?


We still own 51% of them


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 5:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:16 am
Posts: 1873
Location: I raro i te maunga
Dark wrote:
guy smiley wrote:
Eug makes a good point about asset sales...

privatisation has resulted in savings and improved services where, exactly? When has that modern marvel of economic policy actually delivered a positive result for tax payers?


We still own 51% of them
Sir Bill's mates now own the rest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 6:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5699
The 49% sale of assets was harmless as far as I can tell. Most people have an issue with National not spending enough money so a bit weak to hit them up over generating additional funds for the budget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 6:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 32791
Location: in transit
The question about asset sales for me, is what is done with the proceeds. It's all well and good to raise revenue, it's what is done with that that interests me.

You don't get to sell these things when there's a shortfall in service provision, for example, and I think it's fair that taxpayers see their money and investments providing quality service in return.

Retaining part ownership is a side issue to that, although it's a good thing they did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 6:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:16 am
Posts: 1873
Location: I raro i te maunga
Wilderbeast wrote:
The 49% sale of assets was harmless as far as I can tell. Most people have an issue with National not spending enough money so a bit weak to hit them up over generating additional funds for the budget.
I disagree. Those assets delivered dividends to all New Zealanders and now only 50% of them do. What was once owned by everyone is now in the hands of the few who are able to invest. They of course are now free to sell to overseas interest whenever they like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 6:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5699
Thai guy wrote:
Wilderbeast wrote:
The 49% sale of assets was harmless as far as I can tell. Most people have an issue with National not spending enough money so a bit weak to hit them up over generating additional funds for the budget.
I disagree. Those assets delivered dividends to all New Zealanders and now only 50% of them do. What was once owned by everyone is now in the hands of the few who are able to invest. They of course are now free to sell to overseas interest whenever they like.


The profit of the sales went to all nzers. It allowed us to continue our high level of social services without going even further into debt than we did. Would you have preferred national to go even further into debt or cut services?

And frankly, I don’t give a shit who owns the 49% when the govt has 51%.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 6:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20624
Location: A vacant lot next to a pile of rubble
guy smiley wrote:
The question about asset sales for me, is what is done with the proceeds. It's all well and good to raise revenue, it's what is done with that that interests me.

You don't get to sell these things when there's a shortfall in service provision, for example, and I think it's fair that taxpayers see their money and investments providing quality service in return.

Retaining part ownership is a side issue to that, although it's a good thing they did.


My hope was that it would be used to grow those assets where needed (additional power generation for example) so that we would end up getting the additional infrastructure that was required, and as the asset was now larger, effectively own the same or a similar amount of pie as the pie had grown. But it was apparently diverted to other assets that aren't directly self funding such as health and education.

I suspect what we are seeing now with how much maintenance and additional infrastructure is still required in those areas reflects just how much they really needed doing to them. They have a well deserved reputation of being bottomless money pits, even if you only factor in advances in technology and forget about the population growth NZ has been experiencing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5699
The profit from the assets was sucked up into the giant bundle of funding from taxes and other crown revenue. This is then distributed according to govt priorities. This is how it should be imo. Linking revenue to expense can mean initiatives of higher priority end up missing out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:16 am
Posts: 1873
Location: I raro i te maunga
Wilderbeast wrote:
Thai guy wrote:
Wilderbeast wrote:
The 49% sale of assets was harmless as far as I can tell. Most people have an issue with National not spending enough money so a bit weak to hit them up over generating additional funds for the budget.
I disagree. Those assets delivered dividends to all New Zealanders and now only 50% of them do. What was once owned by everyone is now in the hands of the few who are able to invest. They of course are now free to sell to overseas interest whenever they like.


The profit of the sales went to all nzers. It allowed us to continue our high level of social services without going even further into debt than we did. Would you have preferred national to go even further into debt or cut services?

And frankly, I don’t give a shit who owns the 49% when the govt has 51%.
As GS says it's important what was done with the proceeds which were a lot lower than what was forecast and which number the Nats tried to sell it to the country with. They promised it was going into concrete infrastructure - things that would last and serve future generations but it look to have been absorbed into the fake surpluses National posted.

Borrowing rates are and have been at historically low rates so then (and now) was the time to borrow to fulfil social service commitments. It's also a bit rich saying National met social service commitments in light of their failing on housing and health, and their gutting of MPI among others.

No, the asset sales were a straight transfer of assets from all New Zealanders to a wealthy few the proceeds of which were swallowed up in dodgy accounting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 32791
Location: in transit
Fat Old Git wrote:
guy smiley wrote:
The question about asset sales for me, is what is done with the proceeds. It's all well and good to raise revenue, it's what is done with that that interests me.

You don't get to sell these things when there's a shortfall in service provision, for example, and I think it's fair that taxpayers see their money and investments providing quality service in return.

Retaining part ownership is a side issue to that, although it's a good thing they did.


My hope was that it would be used to grow those assets where needed (additional power generation for example) so that we would end up getting the additional infrastructure that was required, and as the asset was now larger, effectively own the same or a similar amount of pie as the pie had grown. But it was apparently diverted to other assets that aren't directly self funding such as health and education.

I suspect what we are seeing now with how much maintenance and additional infrastructure is still required in those areas reflects just how much they really needed doing to them. They have a well deserved reputation of being bottomless money pits, even if you only factor in advances in technology and forget about the population growth NZ has been experiencing.



Spending priorities are a nightmare because everyone has their own philosophy...

mine centre on supporting the weakest area in the economy first... usually social services and health. I think taxing people should see them get a solid return so health and education first for me. Smart healthy people are an asset. Of course you've got to maintain infrastructure and stimulate industry where you can. Nightmare balancing act.


Power generation is a global challenge. We must have all just taken the hydro schemes for granted for years :lol: There's an interesting scheme planned in South Australia. The state has a contract with Tesla for storage batteries and solar panels on 50 000 interconnected homes, forming a virtual grid and power plant all centrally controlled. They already have the largest battery back up in the world in operation and that has already provided essential back up and massive savings, within it's first year. That sort of thinking is where we need to start heading.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20624
Location: A vacant lot next to a pile of rubble
guy smiley wrote:
Fat Old Git wrote:
guy smiley wrote:
The question about asset sales for me, is what is done with the proceeds. It's all well and good to raise revenue, it's what is done with that that interests me.

You don't get to sell these things when there's a shortfall in service provision, for example, and I think it's fair that taxpayers see their money and investments providing quality service in return.

Retaining part ownership is a side issue to that, although it's a good thing they did.


My hope was that it would be used to grow those assets where needed (additional power generation for example) so that we would end up getting the additional infrastructure that was required, and as the asset was now larger, effectively own the same or a similar amount of pie as the pie had grown. But it was apparently diverted to other assets that aren't directly self funding such as health and education.

I suspect what we are seeing now with how much maintenance and additional infrastructure is still required in those areas reflects just how much they really needed doing to them. They have a well deserved reputation of being bottomless money pits, even if you only factor in advances in technology and forget about the population growth NZ has been experiencing.



Spending priorities are a nightmare because everyone has their own philosophy...

mine centre on supporting the weakest area in the economy first... usually social services and health. I think taxing people should see them get a solid return so health and education first for me. Smart healthy people are an asset. Of course you've got to maintain infrastructure and stimulate industry where you can. Nightmare balancing act.


Power generation is a global challenge. We must have all just taken the hydro schemes for granted for years :lol: There's an interesting scheme planned in South Australia. The state has a contract with Tesla for storage batteries and solar panels on 50 000 interconnected homes, forming a virtual grid and power plant all centrally controlled. They already have the largest battery back up in the world in operation and that has already provided essential back up and massive savings, within it's first year. That sort of thinking is where we need to start heading.


Solar panels should be a current requirement on the roof of any new build in imho. Why build a massive power plant and network if you can generate a lot of it at the point of use?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:32 am 
Dark wrote:
guy smiley wrote:
Eug makes a good point about asset sales...

privatisation has resulted in savings and improved services where, exactly? When has that modern marvel of economic policy actually delivered a positive result for tax payers?


We still own 51% of them



And ?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:37 am 
Online

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 9586
Thai guy wrote:
Wilderbeast wrote:
Thai guy wrote:
Wilderbeast wrote:
The 49% sale of assets was harmless as far as I can tell. Most people have an issue with National not spending enough money so a bit weak to hit them up over generating additional funds for the budget.
I disagree. Those assets delivered dividends to all New Zealanders and now only 50% of them do. What was once owned by everyone is now in the hands of the few who are able to invest. They of course are now free to sell to overseas interest whenever they like.


The profit of the sales went to all nzers. It allowed us to continue our high level of social services without going even further into debt than we did. Would you have preferred national to go even further into debt or cut services?

And frankly, I don’t give a shit who owns the 49% when the govt has 51%.
As GS says it's important what was done with the proceeds which were a lot lower than what was forecast and which number the Nats tried to sell it to the country with. They promised it was going into concrete infrastructure - things that would last and serve future generations but it look to have been absorbed into the fake surpluses National posted.

Borrowing rates are and have been at historically low rates so then (and now) was the time to borrow to fulfil social service commitments. It's also a bit rich saying National met social service commitments in light of their failing on housing and health, and their gutting of MPI among others.

No, the asset sales were a straight transfer of assets from all New Zealanders to a wealthy few the proceeds of which were swallowed up in dodgy accounting.


If that's what happened (it didn't) I would call that pretty f**king good accounting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19271
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left
They corresponded very nicely to the tax cuts that the Nats made, didn't they? And they favoured the top end of the market


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:47 am 
Noooooo you don’t say.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: NZ Politics Thread
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5699
Enzedder wrote:
They corresponded very nicely to the tax cuts that the Nats made, didn't they? And they favoured the top end of the market


This is debatable. The rich certainly gained more out of the tax breaks as individuals, but the entire package costs hundreds of millions and a good 80% of that went to middle and lower income groups (due to numbers).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29844 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364 ... 747  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Biffer29, Bindi, earl the beaver, Floppykid, Google Adsense [Bot], Jim Lahey, johnstrac, Leinsterman, Liathroidigloine, Luckycharmer, Monk Zombie, mr bungle, Mr Mike, nardol, PornDog, rfurlong, Rinkals, SaintK, Santa, sewa, shereblue, The Sun God, ZappaMan and 75 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group